Topic Wiki

Copied From the Learn Photography Master Thread: Lesson 1


Choosing a camera: Point and Shoot vs. Mirrorless vs. DSLR


Before you even start thinking which camera model to buy, you have to decide something much more important: the type of camera. There are three main types of cameras on the market today, and they each offer some things the others don't. Let's take a quick at them and see what the differences are and why you might choose one over the other.


Point & Shoots (P&S): These are by far the most popular cameras out there. Usually extremely compact, they're all easy to use, relatively cheap, and deliver great images. The point & shoot ranges from tiny shirt-pocket cameras such as the Canon Elph series, to large superzooms (sometimes called all-in-ones or bridge cameras) such as the Panasonic FZ series, to 'advanced' P&Ss like the Canon G series or the $2800(!) Sony RX-1. All P&Ss have fixed (non-removable) lenses.


Point & Shoot pros:
--- Amazing selection: At the time of this writing, B&H has 328 cameras in stock listed under Point & Shoot. A basic Canon Elph-style camera usually has a 3-8x zoom lens, a 3" screen, 1080p video, image stabilization, and a million other features. Should you could choose a superzoom, you'd get a 24-50x zoom, manual controls, a viewfinder, and (usually) a hotshoe for flashes. Advanced P&Ss will give you even more control, better, larger sensors, and higher quality lenses. Want a camera your baby could drop into a bowl of cereal? There are currently 18 different shock and waterproof cameras [url=http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?ipp=100&Ns=p_PRODUCT_SHORT_DESCR|0&ci=8612&N=4288586279+35+4052359761&srtclk=sort]available
. Want a screen that swivels? Built-in GPS? WiFi? Check, check, and check. One screen not enough, you want two of 'em? Check!
--- Cheap: Even a $100 P&S will give you better pictures than a $500 camera from 5 years ago. You do not need to spend a fortune to get amazing pictures.
--- Light and easy to carry: No excuses for not shlepping the camera. If fits into your shirt pocket, a purse, just about anywhere.
--- Great video: Most current cameras are capable of recording 1080p HD video, or at least 720p. Combined with ubiquitous image stabilization P&Ss are capable of outputting awesome video.
--- Easy to use: Most P&S will only have an Auto or P mode, although some advanced or superzoom models will have full manual control. In Auto mode all you have to do is press the button. Some cameras even have an 'intelligent' auto feature where it could detect if you're shooting a flower, a portrait, etc. and adjust itself accordingly. This actually works pretty well on most cameras. In P mode you get a bit more control (you could turn the flash off, adjust the picture brighter or darker, etc.), but the camera still handles most of the decisions making for you.


Point & Shoot Cons:
--- Image quality relative to mirrorless and DSLRs: Yes, P&Ss will give you great picture quality - when situations are ideal. But if you plan to be shooting a lot in darker situations (indoors, your kids' school play) you will notice a considerable difference in quality compared to the other two. Sharpness will also not be as good as the others - the combination of a small physical lens, a small sensor, and over-zealous noise reduction (more on all of these later) is not a recipe for razor-sharp photos. These factors will be much less of an issue with advanced cameras such as the Canon G15, although a mirrorless or DSLR will still be far better.
--- Hard or impossible to achieve certain effects: You know that portrait look where the entire background is just blurred into creamy nothingness? That's one of the hardest things to create with a P&S (and conversely one of the easiest things to do with an SLR/mirrorless). Later on I'll show you some techniques to force this effect out of a P&S (to a degree), but the physics are simply not in your favor.
--- Speed: Compared to a DSLR, the P&S is practically a turtle. It takes a few seconds to turn on, zooming takes time, every setting change takes time. Most importantly though, is the speed at which the camera takes the picture. While a DSLR focuses almost instantly, a P&S could take a second or two. Once the image is in focus, there is a maddening delay called shutter lag, which is the time between you pressing the shutter button and the camera actually taking the picture. Between focusing and shutter lag, it could sometimes take 3 or more seconds to get your shoot, at which point the moment may be long gone. Later on we'll discuss some techniques for speeding this process up, but it'll still take far longer than a DSLR.
--- Not much control: The flip side to the P&S's ease of use it its lack of control. Want to lower your flash power so that people don't have that 'deer in headlights' look? Tough noogies. Want to change your aperture? Your shutter speed? Ain't happenin'. Of course some cameras do let you change all that, but a) they're in the minority by far, and b) since these are secondary features, you'll probably have to dig through 6 menu pages every time you want to make a change.
--- Limited expandability: A P&S is a closed system. Want a longer or wider lens? Want to use filters? No dice on most cameras. This is also a big issue if you ever want to dabble in lighting - it'll be quite difficult with a P&S.
____________


DSLRs: The big, black, "professional" looking cameras. Big, heavy, and (relatively) expensive, these have interchangeable lenses and optical viewfinders. The big players are Canon and Nikon, with Sony and Pentax having a small but dedicated market share. A typical 'starter' DSLR will have a 18 (Canon) or 24 (Nikon) megapixel sensor, come with an 18-55mm lens, and have actual buttons for only the most important tasks. As you move up through the lineup, you'll get more direct buttons and knobs, status LCDs, better focusing/metering systems, more lens support, metal or magnesium bodies, weather sealing, wireless flash control, higher frame-per-second rates, and more. You also get better kit lenses (that's the lens that comes with the camera) as you move up, and at a certain level (usually the third camera in the lineup) you'll also be able to buy the camera body by itself without any lens.


DSLR pros:
--- Image quality: This is the number one benefit of the DSLR - even the cheapest camera and lens combination will give you better pictures that any point and shoot, even if the P&S costs much more. (B&H currently lists 3 DSLR kits (camera and lens) for $450 - that's cheaper than some P&Ss.) Looking at pictures of a P&S and a DSLR side by side, you'll be blown away by the difference in sharpness, color, and dynamic range (explained later) of the DSLR. When it comes to low light, there's no contest; the DSLR wins hand down.
--- Control: In a DLSR you have control over every single shooting parameter. There are no limits to what you could create; everything's at your beck and call. Flash power, exposure, color, and most importantly, RAW shooting. (I'll get into far more detail on that last thing later.)
--- Special effects: Out of focus backgrounds? Easy peasy. Long exposures? Timelapse? You bet.
--- System expandability: DSLRs are sometimes called 'system cameras'. This is due to the fact that unlike P&Ss, a DSLR is not just a camera; it's at the heart of an entire system. Each brand has dozens of lenses available, plus many more from third-party lens manufacturers. You could get flashes, transmitters, remotes, and many other goodies and they will all work seamlessly and communicate properly to one another. BTW, this is why you should choose your first SLR very carefully: you're probably buying into a system. First you get a camera and lens, then another lens, then maybe another lens or a flash, and then the a new camera comes out so you buy that. It's quite the pain to switch to a different brand once you're bought in to the system.
--- Viewfinder: By definition, a DSLR is a single lens reflex camera; what that means is that inside the camera just behind the lens mount there's a mirror, which projects the image from the lens into a prism, which in turn shows up in the viewfinder. The big advantage of this is that when you look through the viewfinder you're actually looking through lens, and as such are seeing exactly what the lens sees. This gives you an extremely accurate and life-like view, which makes it easy to compose your shots properly. A viewfinder also lets you use the camera in bright light without worrying about not being able to see the screen.
--- Speed: A DSLR is ready to shoot almost instantly after being turned on. No matter where you are, be it a menu or playing back you pictures, a slight tap of the shutter button and the camera is instantly ready to shoot. Focus is nearly instantaneous, and shutter lag is pretty much a non-issue. Another speed aspect is continuous shooting - holding down the shutter button while the camera rattles off picture after picture. An entry-level camera  could easily do around 4.5fps (frames per second), while higher level cameras could do 7 or 8 (or 12, if you count the $6800 Canon 1D X).


DSLR cons:
--- Size and weight: There's no getting around it: DSLRs are big and bulky, especially if you're carrying more than one lens.
--- Price: DSLRs start at about $450, and go way up. One of the most common cameras, the Canon T4i, will set you back about a grand. And then you want to buy another lens. And another one. And another one... :D
--- Video: DSLR video is a really weird situation. On the one hand the quality is INSANE. Just look on Vimeo and see what people have been doing with the Canon 5DMk2 and Mk3 and you'll see what I mean. On the other hand, if you look at the behind the scenes video of one of those, you'll see that the camera is mounted on a rig costing $10K or more. The rig stabilizes the camera and provides support for the focus controls, the zoom controls, the sound system, and many other things. Why is all this necessary? Very simple - because the camera does a horrible job at all this if left to it's own devices. Focusing during video is horrible, especially if anything's moving through the scene. What this means is that if you're buying an SLR and are planning on taking videos of your kids running around in the park, you will be sorely disappointed - nothing will be in focus half the time, and when the camera finally does achieve focus, the built-in mike will have picked up every grind and whirr of the lens as it moved back and forth. Canon has made some progress on eliminating these issues with their new STM lenses, but for now that's only two cameras and two lenses, and even that isn't perfect.


__________


Mirrorless: Known by many different names (ILCs and EVILs for example), the industry has seemed to settle on Mirrorless lately. This was the brainchild of a joint venture between Olympus and Panasonic, and was aimed on creating an interchangeable-lens camera in with a P&S body and DSLR-like image quality, and has been wildly successful. Olympus and Panasonic are still the major players with their Micro 4/3s system, followed by Sony with their NEX line. Many others have tried to take over market share from the big 3, but have been largely unsuccessful mainly due to inferior products. Nikon 1, Canon, M, and Samsung NX are examples of fairly unpopular systems.


Most mirrorless cameras have a P&S form-factor, albeit somewhat larger. With the exception of Olympus and Panasonic, the lenses are not interchangeable between brands, but adapters are available to convert practically any DSLR (or old rangefinder camera) lens to just about every system. Most adapters will not autofocus the lens, so it's not exactly a perfect solution.


Mirrorless pros:
--- Size and weight: This is the main draw for most people. While not exactly pocket sized once a lens is in place, it it still a fairly compact kit and could be carried in a purse with ease. It's more like a large P&S than a small DSLR.
--- Price: Generally cheaper than a DSLR of a similar level. The Panasonics and Olympus (Olympusus? Olympi? ??? ) especially seem to be on sale more often than not.
--- Image quality: About as good as an SLR, simple as that.
--- Expandability: Like DSLRs, these cameras are part of a system. In the last couple of months more and more third parties have started to make lenses too. Micro 4/3s is a much more robust system then Sony NEX though, with many more lenses available.
--- Video: Video on mirrorless cameras is insanely fantastic. Similar in quality to an SLR, but with the ease of use of a P&S. It focuses quickly, perfectly, and fairly quietly.


Mirrorless cons:
--- Lenses: Far smaller selection than SLRs, although to be fair most important lenses are covered.
--- Image quality: A DSLR will still have slightly better image quality, especially in low light scenarios.
--- Viewfinders: Most donít have viewfinders at all, which make it harder to use in low light. Some of those have axillary finders you could out in the hotshoe (usually at exorbitant prices or some reason), but these are just to give you a general idea of what the camera is seeing.
--- Batteries: Uses batteries like a P&S (200-400 shots), while a DSLR usually gets around 2000 shots per battery.
--- Speed: Focusing, while worlds better than P&Ss, isn't quite up to DSLR standards yet, but that's getting better every day.
--- Control: While mirrorless camera offer the same level of control as DSLRs, very often you'll have to dig through menus to get to where you want to. The main point of mirrorless being cutting down on size, buttons and knobs were eliminated without mercy.


___________


Lesson Summary:
--- Point & Shoots are great for most everyday shooting. Cheap, more options than you could ever want, great image quality and video. Quite difficult (but definitely possible - I'll show you how) to get the 'pro' look.
--- DSLR are king when it comes to image quality, control, and expandability. For the best pictures in any situation, go for a DSLR. Video, not so much.
--- Mirrorless cameras are the best of both worlds, with some caveats. Amazing image quality, the best video, and fairly small and portable. Less control and versatility than an SLR, though.

___________


For the full lesson series visit the Learn Photography Master Thread.

____________________________________________________

Links to additional Info:

Learn Photography Master Thread: Lesson 2: Camera specs - What do they mean, and which ones matter to me?

Canon's DSLR naming scheme
Nikon's DSLR naming scheme
« Last edited by Curlyhead on August 10, 2016, 11:42:18 AM »

Author Topic: Which Camera Should I Get? Master Thread  (Read 112226 times)

Offline Knaper_Chuchem

  • Dansdeals Gold Elite
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 164
  • Total likes: 0
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: NYC
Re: Which Camera Should I Get? Master Thread
« Reply #90 on: December 02, 2013, 02:16:54 PM »
G15 vs SX280?

I'm as ignorant as it gets when it comes to cameras... Basically all we can do is point 'n shoot, and review afterwards.. But I'm stingy too, and we like good quality pictures. I see Amazon has the SX280 for $199 + free 16gb (class 10) SD card. Combined with the Amex/Amazon offer (if you buy 2 Amazon $75 Gift cards) you can have it for $150.

Questions remains, for the laymen, what is a better camera, the G15 or the SX280? 

Thanks!

Offline est

  • Dansdeals Platinum Elite
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Posts: 300
  • Total likes: 0
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
  • Gender: Female
    • View Profile
Re: Which Camera Should I Get? Master Thread
« Reply #91 on: December 02, 2013, 09:48:44 PM »
The 530 is still .$15 difference from 130. Worth it?
Also is the s110 worth the price difference? I do want a good camera

By auto lighting I mean when u put it on auto for the flash sometimes it comes out wrong lighting

Paging something fishy... Can you please answer this?
I'm debating bet the 530 and s110 is it worth the diff? Is there a different camera altogether that I should buy? Thanx again

Online Something Fishy

  • Global Moderator
  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • **********
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 5151
  • Total likes: 402
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 37
    • View Profile
    • My Flickr Page
  • Location: Not Brooklyn
Re: Which Camera Should I Get? Master Thread
« Reply #92 on: December 03, 2013, 01:04:54 AM »
G15 vs SX280?

I'm as ignorant as it gets when it comes to cameras... Basically all we can do is point 'n shoot, and review afterwards.. But I'm stingy too, and we like good quality pictures. I see Amazon has the SX280 for $199 + free 16gb (class 10) SD card. Combined with the Amex/Amazon offer (if you buy 2 Amazon $75 Gift cards) you can have it for $150.

Questions remains, for the laymen, what is a better camera, the G15 or the SX280? 

Thanks!

G15 is better but very large and bulky. The s110 has the same internals as the g5, so get that if anything. If you could still find that for $200 then the sx280 is a horrible deal.

Otherwise for a simple, all around good camera the 530 hs would probably do it for you.
Check out all my Trip Reports here!

Online Something Fishy

  • Global Moderator
  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • **********
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 5151
  • Total likes: 402
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 37
    • View Profile
    • My Flickr Page
  • Location: Not Brooklyn
Re: Which Camera Should I Get? Master Thread
« Reply #93 on: December 03, 2013, 01:05:36 AM »
Paging something fishy... Can you please answer this?
I'm debating bet the 530 and s110 is it worth the diff? Is there a different camera altogether that I should buy? Thanx again

Methinks that for $15 bucks it's a worthwhile upgrade.
Check out all my Trip Reports here!

Offline smurf

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 4388
  • Total likes: 1
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 8
    • View Profile
  • Location: NJ
Re: Which Camera Should I Get? Master Thread
« Reply #94 on: December 03, 2013, 10:32:24 AM »
G15 is better but very large and bulky. The s110 has the same internals as the g5, so get that if anything. If you could still find that for $200 then the sx280 is a horrible deal.

Otherwise for a simple, all around good camera the 530 hs would probably do it for you.
s110 still 220 on amazon with bundled case and sd card

Offline Ez

  • Dansdeals Platinum Elite + Lifetime Gold Elite
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 812
  • Total likes: 6
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Location: NY
Re: Which Camera Should I Get? Master Thread
« Reply #95 on: December 04, 2013, 12:57:58 PM »
The J1 is one of the most underrated cameras out there. It's actually quite nice (the focus speed is the fastest of any Mless camera). However, keep in mind that sensor-wise it's still below all others - it has a 1" sensor vs. M4/3 or APS-C. So picture quality wise is way ahead of the s110, but still behind all other MLs.

In the $350 range you'd usually find some nice Olympuses and Panasonics. I don't have time now to go look for deals on them, but if you find anything or want to compare some options I'd be happy to help.

Amazon Deal of the day

Olympus E-PM2 16MP Compact System Camera with 14-42mm and 40-150mm Two Lens Kit

What's your opinion on this camera? and is this a deal worth getting?
TIA

Online Something Fishy

  • Global Moderator
  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • **********
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 5151
  • Total likes: 402
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 37
    • View Profile
    • My Flickr Page
  • Location: Not Brooklyn
Re: Which Camera Should I Get? Master Thread
« Reply #96 on: December 04, 2013, 01:24:56 PM »
Amazon Deal of the day

Olympus E-PM2 16MP Compact System Camera with 14-42mm and 40-150mm Two Lens Kit

What's your opinion on this camera? and is this a deal worth getting?
TIA

Looks like a great deal. It's not "the latest and greatest", but at that price that's some seriously good gear.
Check out all my Trip Reports here!

Offline Knaper_Chuchem

  • Dansdeals Gold Elite
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2011
  • Posts: 164
  • Total likes: 0
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 0
    • View Profile
  • Location: NYC
Re: Which Camera Should I Get? Master Thread
« Reply #97 on: December 04, 2013, 02:10:49 PM »
G15 is better but very large and bulky. The s110 has the same internals as the g5, so get that if anything. If you could still find that for $200 then the sx280 is a horrible deal.

Otherwise for a simple, all around good camera the 530 hs would probably do it for you.


I appreciate your advice!

I'd like to elaborate on my first question if you'll allow me. I'm not sure if I stressed it enough, but I never use any of the manual settings on my camera, in fact I only use the default settings. That said, my question remains if I have any advantage using the G15 over any other Point 'n Shoot Camera? Is the Quality of the picture better with the G15 vs the others? Is it DSLR like quality with the G15?  The reason I asked on the SX280 is the 20x Optical zoom that I like.

Thanks again!

Online Something Fishy

  • Global Moderator
  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • **********
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 5151
  • Total likes: 402
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 37
    • View Profile
    • My Flickr Page
  • Location: Not Brooklyn
Re: Which Camera Should I Get? Master Thread
« Reply #98 on: December 04, 2013, 03:01:32 PM »


I appreciate your advice!

I'd like to elaborate on my first question if you'll allow me. I'm not sure if I stressed it enough, but I never use any of the manual settings on my camera, in fact I only use the default settings. That said, my question remains if I have any advantage using the G15 over any other Point 'n Shoot Camera? Is the Quality of the picture better with the G15 vs the others? Is it DSLR like quality with the G15?  The reason I asked on the SX280 is the 20x Optical zoom that I like.

Thanks again!

Read my lesson on sensor sizes (check my signature) and you'll see that the g15 has a somewhat larger sensor than the sx20, but FAR smaller than a DSLR. That means (roughly) that even on auto, the picture will be better than the sx, but not close to a DSLR at all. The s110 also has the same sensor as the g15.

If you always stay on auto, you're basically trading somewhat better pictures for a better zoom (not counting camera size etc.).
Check out all my Trip Reports here!

Offline whYME

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 2420
  • Total likes: 99
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 3
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Which Camera Should I Get? Master Thread
« Reply #99 on: December 05, 2013, 12:30:46 AM »
Fishy, have you weighed in at all on this current T3i deal?

I plan on buying either an SLR or mirrorless within the next month or 2, Is this a good enough deal that I should just jump at it, or should I wait around and figure out what camera I really want?
This is pretty much my budget, up to $500. Is this the most camera I'll get for $500?

(IIRC you're a Nikon guy, I'm not sure if or how that affects your answer here...)

Online Something Fishy

  • Global Moderator
  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • **********
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 5151
  • Total likes: 402
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 37
    • View Profile
    • My Flickr Page
  • Location: Not Brooklyn
Re: Which Camera Should I Get? Master Thread
« Reply #100 on: December 05, 2013, 12:39:31 AM »
Fishy, have you weighed in at all on this current T3i deal?

I plan on buying either an SLR or mirrorless within the next month or 2, Is this a good enough deal that I should just jump at it, or should I wait around and figure out what camera I really want?
This is pretty much my budget, up to $500. Is this the most camera I'll get for $500?

(IIRC you're a Nikon guy, I'm not sure if or how that affects your answer here...)

No Canon is ever worth getting, so this is a horrible deal.
Check out all my Trip Reports here!

Online Something Fishy

  • Global Moderator
  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • **********
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 5151
  • Total likes: 402
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 37
    • View Profile
    • My Flickr Page
  • Location: Not Brooklyn
Re: Which Camera Should I Get? Master Thread
« Reply #101 on: December 05, 2013, 12:40:05 AM »
In all seriousness though, this is a pretty good deal. The long lens is fairly mediocre, and the camera is 3 years old, but it's still an enormous value for your money.

Think about if you need the long lens though - if you don't you may be better off with a mirrorless and kit lens. Or save some money toward a better lens.

 In general, what would make you choose DSLR over ML or vice versa?
Check out all my Trip Reports here!

Offline whYME

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 2420
  • Total likes: 99
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 3
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Which Camera Should I Get? Master Thread
« Reply #102 on: December 05, 2013, 12:54:44 AM »
The big advantage for me of ML is the portability.

The biggest reason for wanting an SLR is probably psychological, my brain has been wired for so long to want one and it hasn't quite gotten used to the idea of the ML.
The extensibility (sp?) is also a big draw for the SLR. I don't know how much I'll actually take advantage of it, but I like the comfort of knowing that any accessory or lens i might want is out there.
I also definitely want a viewfinder, so I think that pretty much eliminates the lower cost MLs.

I definitely want the long lens. I frequently find myself wishing I had a longer lens, particularly on road trips / vacations...

Online Something Fishy

  • Global Moderator
  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • **********
  • Join Date: Jan 2011
  • Posts: 5151
  • Total likes: 402
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 37
    • View Profile
    • My Flickr Page
  • Location: Not Brooklyn
Re: Which Camera Should I Get? Master Thread
« Reply #103 on: December 05, 2013, 01:00:55 AM »
The extensibility (sp?) is also a big draw for the SLR. I don't know how much I'll actually take advantage of it, but I like the comfort of knowing that any accessory or lens i might want is out there.
M4/3 would give you all that.

I also definitely want a viewfinder, so I think that pretty much eliminates the lower cost MLs.
Very true. :(

I definitely want the long lens. I frequently find myself wishing I had a longer lens, particularly on road trips / vacations...
Then this sound's like the perfect kit for you. Viewfinder, long lens, extendibility (my spelling's as good as your's :P), and portability (it's relatively small, as DSLRs go).
Check out all my Trip Reports here!

Offline whYME

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 2420
  • Total likes: 99
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 3
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
Re: Which Camera Should I Get? Master Thread
« Reply #104 on: December 05, 2013, 01:12:08 AM »
Then this sound's like the perfect kit for you. Viewfinder, long lens, extendibility (my spelling's as good as your's :P), and portability (it's relatively small, as DSLRs go).
Thanks.
I'm going to order it now before I lose the chance and I'll figure out later if I want to keep it...