US Politics/2016 Election Pick Your Poison Master Thread

[danrocks613]

[ExGingi]

ALOL a couple of times. My initial thought was put this on TV in swing states, but then I started to wonder how a similar video made on DJT would look.

[tov hashem]

I usually vote for the one who the media mocks.

[Yammer]

I usually vote for the one who the media mocks.

I actually vote for the candidate (and his views) that I like.....

[CS1]

I actually vote for the candidate (and his views) that I like.....

this time it's hard to find a candidate to like. both committed unpresidential crimes/faux pas. One committed more than the other. And one will be much better for Israel. (Hint: Max Blumenthal will NOT help Israel -- on the contrary, he's harmful to Israel)

[good sam]

Last 5 seconds is the best.

[tov hashem]

I hate trump but I'm still going to vote for him because I can't stand the coroption of hilery. and the fact that the media and the politicians are so against him!

[username]

I actually vote for the candidate (and his views) that I like.....

When available

[Dan]

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/09/29/dont-vote-for-donald-trump-editorial-board-editorials-debates/91295020/

"In the 34-year history of USA TODAY, the Editorial Board has never taken sides in the presidential race. Instead, we’ve expressed opinions about the major issues and haven’t presumed to tell our readers, who have a variety of priorities and values, which choice is best for them. Because every presidential race is different, we revisit our no-endorsement policy every four years. We’ve never seen reason to alter our approach. Until now.

This year, the choice isn’t between two capable major party nominees who happen to have significant ideological differences. This year, one of the candidates — Republican nominee Donald Trump — is, by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency."

[Dan]

http://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/editorial/2016/09/27/hillary-clinton-endorsement/91198668/

"Since The Arizona Republic began publication in 1890, we have never endorsed a Democrat over a Republican for president. Never. This reflects a deep philosophical appreciation for conservative ideals and Republican principles.

This year is different.

The 2016 Republican candidate is not conservative and he is not qualified.

That’s why, for the first time in our history, The Arizona Republic will support a Democrat for president."

[yuneeq]

http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2016/09/29/dont-vote-for-donald-trump-editorial-board-editorials-debates/91295020/

"In the 34-year history of USA TODAY, the Editorial Board has never taken sides in the presidential race. Instead, we’ve expressed opinions about the major issues and haven’t presumed to tell our readers, who have a variety of priorities and values, which choice is best for them. Because every presidential race is different, we revisit our no-endorsement policy every four years. We’ve never seen reason to alter our approach. Until now.

This year, the choice isn’t between two capable major party nominees who happen to have significant ideological differences. This year, one of the candidates — Republican nominee Donald Trump — is, by unanimous consensus of the Editorial Board, unfit for the presidency."

Translation: Historically we only implicitly endorsed the Democratic candidate but this year we can get away with a public endorsement.

[Dan]

Translation: Historically we only implicitly endorsed the Democratic candidate but this year we can get away with a public endorsement.

They didn't endorse Clinton. They said her opponent is unfit for office.

[yuneeq]

They didn't endorse Clinton. They said her opponent is unfit for office.

Actually in their own words, they said that they never took sides but they revisited their endorsement policy and they decided to alter their approach.

If you ask me it would look better for them to simply write "we endorse Hillary" instead of just saying that Trump is unfit.
Because according to many smart people they are both unfit, but it would still be a better option if you choose the lesser poison.

[Dan]

Actually in their own words, "The Editorial Board does not have a consensus for a Clinton endorsement."

ftfy

[yuneeq]

ftfy

I didn't read the article just saw your quote...

[tov hashem]

We can not afford Hillary Clinton's mistakes (which I think was the best statement against her by the debate that she admitted that she remembers that it was deleted). Trump has a nature of using all qualifications when needed--  meshuga when needed-- normal when needed. Which I think will make him a good president! ( but I still hate him!!)

[Toasted]

https://mobile.twitter.com/ChatRevolve/status/781306081746284550/video/1

Interesting stuff.

[danrocks613]

https://mobile.twitter.com/ChatRevolve/status/781306081746284550/video/1

Interesting stuff.

http://thejewishbuzz.com/2016/09/29/rumor-clinton-received-debate-questions-week-before-debate/  if this is true this is MAJOR

[CS1]

http://thejewishbuzz.com/2016/09/29/rumor-clinton-received-debate-questions-week-before-debate/  if this is true this is MAJOR

she was 100% prepared with answers to each and every question. She answered in a scripted manner immediately.
It appeared that they were both told the questions in advance, weren't they?

[elit]

https://mobile.twitter.com/ChatRevolve/status/781306081746284550/video/1

Interesting stuff.

What makes him mystery man? Bc u don't know who he is?...cmon guys u can't believe every thing on the internet