The lawsuits are about when the children were all separated. We all remember ZERO tolerance, correct?
So we are at the point of should the justice department settle with them or let the lawsuits play out.
If you agree that they should have not been separated then what is the remedy?
You may notice I rarely participate in political talks here, and it's because I often don't know the answers, or don't believe it will help for me to argue. I can't comment on if they should or shouldn't be separated, because I don't know the circumstances. I do know people come here illegally, and I do know that people should not be seperated, but I also know that there are cases (not at the border) where people are separated and in many of those cases, while unfortunate, it is warranted. This is precisely why I wanted you to answer my previous question, because I want to learn from you, what you believe differentiates them. I'm open to learning and listening, even respectfully disagreeing, but if we cannot have dialogue, neither of us can. If you were Border patrol and children were coming in with parents illegally, how do you handle that? Should them being together be forfeited due to them breaking the law? At what point is it the only/best option? Is it ever? I have no answers, but I like to hear what others think.