Well, for example, lo tirtzach cannot be referring to this situation. We know that all aseres hadibros are issurim for which one is chayav misah - that's how we know lo tignov refers to kidnapping and not common theft. We also know, al pi halochah, that retzichah of an akum is not chayav misah, so i hope you did not mean that when you say "to the full extent of the law".