I have a question. I hold a fund, AONIX, conservative allocation (fund of funds but no added layer of expense). All the rating companies rate it low--Morningstar, for example, gives it two stars. But when I look at the five star funds in this class, their risk profile is much higher than AONIX. Look at BERIX, for example. Solid fund, relatively lower risk, but its overall risk is somewhat higher than AONIX. How can Morningstar compare a 2 risk fund with a 4/5 risk fund, even if they are classified in the same investment style? I ask because it seems that AONIX is a solid fund for what its supposed to do, but no one will agree with me.
On a different note, does anyone hold SICNX? Seems like a solid player as of late, against OAKIX, which I hold, and which is supposed to be solid.