Did I?
Here is what I wrote:
My point mainly being that when we ask questions of others, trying to find out their ideas or opinions, we shouldn't really do it with any preconceived assumptions, but rather ask straightforward question seeking explanation (or clarification). I wouldn't have written what I wrote had the OP ommited the word "yet" from the question.
But rather than directly answer (or wait for OP to respond) you proceeded with what looks like you were making assumptions (implied), projections (referencing Chabad, rather than questioning me), and value judgments ("sad").
Hence @aygart's comment
Now that I can respond on a full stomach
Should I assume your shitos are different the chabad shitos? I mean no disrespect just that I have never heard of anyone not having a baseline of EY is primary all things equal. Mentioning chabad was my way of saying I don't know all their shitos and would be ok with EY not being the baseline if that was the Shita. (which would also not make it sad). If however the baseline is Chutz Laretz is =/> to EY without a serious shita behind it that would be sad. One Shita I can think of would be something along the lines of "Hashem didn't bring us back yet" that would state that the baseline is not EY.
I have 0 issues with staying in chutz l'aretz for a myriad of reasons, however I am still of the belief that starting ground is EY all things equal. Responding that
If the reason is that it may be better for frumkeit then that can be countered by how there are ways that it is worse etc.
Only says to me there may be legitimate reasons to stay. Which is not my point.
A response of a map of Chabad houses all over the world only indicates that there is a major reason to stay in chutz l'aretz vs E"Y but it is surely possible without the reason (whatever it may be) that the baseline is E"Y.
I am hoping that my distinction between a baseline Shita and reasons one way or another is clear.