The Lufthansa Anti-Semitism Fiasco In Frankfurt

[Euclid]

There was not just a single story, it was his famous bracha he gave when yidden were complaining about the local galach, village leader or stam a evil goyish neighbor making them Tzaros , that they should cease or else they'll decease, so to speak. Many many wonder stories known with this particular bracha of his.

Aha. Thank you for explaining this to an ignorant Lakewood litvak

[Live N Learn]

.

[Alexsei]

https://www.paddleyourownkanoo.com/2022/05/09/german-airline-lufthansa-accused-of-anti-semitism-after-throwing-passengers-off-flight-because-they-looked-jewish/


https://traveltomorrow.com/orthodox-jewish-passengers-barred-from-boarding-a-lufthansa-flight/

[Joel]

@Dan

[yelped]

@Dan

Typical big tech. I was temp banned from Twitter for posting about Kenneth Roth being an accessory to murdering Jews. I'm assuming it was AI that blocked me, but even an appeal did not help. Some bird brain doesn't know how to read

[chff]

https://twitter.com/Joelmpetlin/status/1523628648095678464

[Dan]

https://twitter.com/DansDeals/status/1523634922187288576

[Dan]

Someone get Libsofticktock on board, this story could use more secular exposure.
She had the same”issue” of being Jewish….so maybe can relate..

Feel free to forward/tag.

[Something Fishy]

[YitzyS]

[Euclid]

In the same post as the Saudi girl rebbe; lol I love HV

[AsherO]

If you have permission from the owner, you can't credit it to yourself? This video is going around like nuts, and you surfaced it and rightfully deserve the credit.

Maybe this poster should get a vacation from DDF, per his handle

(Not posting as a mod)

[YitzyS]

I have a question.

In my opinion, there are two ways to understand the video of the supervisor, both of which are bad, but one way is worse than the other. Here is where I think it's ambiguous:

Passenger: This is gruesome. Lufthansa: It would have been if you were African, if you were Polander.

What did the supervisor mean?

1) It would have been [gruesome] if you were African, if you were Polander [but it's not gruesome because your are Jewish].

or

2) It would have been [the same] if you were African [then all Africans would've been denied], if you were Polander [then all Polanders would've been denied].

Both ways are bad, but the first is obviously worse. Number 1 means that it would be okay if you were Jewish, but not otherwise [Terrible!]. Number 2 means that it's okay to give collective punishment and you must suffer for the actions of other Jews [bad!], but it would've been the same for any other distinguishable group.

It's obvious that some, including OJPAC, seem to understand it the first way, but based on the supervisor's difficulty in speaking English and the rest of her conversation, I suspect she meant the second way. No, it doesn't make it acceptable in any way, and a lawsuit is very very warranted, but we should be careful how we characterize her statement so that we maintain our own credibility.

[Sam 77]

@Dan why did you mention Elon musk in your tweet?

[yuneeq]

@Dan why did you mention Elon musk in your tweet?

Likely because Elon is a big proponent of free speech and he doesn’t want Twitter deleting the clip

[Dan]

@Dan why did you mention Elon musk in your tweet?

https://twitter.com/DansDeals/status/1523649184062078976

[AsherO]

YitzyS, I understood the Supervisors words to be the second way. Keep in mind that English isn’t the first language for these police and LH employees, so some gets lost in linguistic/cultural translation.

[jj1000]

Likely because Elon is a big proponent of free speech and he doesn’t want Twitter deleting the clip

Actually he wants FSD to go to airplanes and the whole need for FA's and gate agents to go away. But close enough

[Dan]

https://twitter.com/YossiGestetner/status/1523650567146409984

[VacationLover]

Maybe this poster should get a vacation from DDF, per his handle

(Not posting as a mod)

It appears that I wasn't clear enough.
If @Dan Has permission from the owner, he should've added his name/logo on the video.
I am not justifying or defending any outlet that repost's something without permission and not crediting to the source.
That being said, this video went ballistic, and it is clear that Dan had permission to edit it, and I was wondering why he didn't add his name/logo.
ETA: when any major news outlet posts a video (say CNN) they add their logo on it, I doesn't mean that they "took" the video, but that they got hold of it and permission to post it.