For every study there's another study showing the opposite.
It's like that in all sciences, climate, economics and all others. Each side spins for their side.
For you not to care about the fact, that literally hundreds of thousands of frumme yidden will be losing a lot of money. And many of them are genuinely poor. Because of some study and economics sevara you just read about. Shows me you don't care enough. Sorry, that's what I believe to be true.
Are you an Economist? Do you realize there are Nobel winning economists who laugh out loud when they hear about all this trickle down economics theory.
1. Let me explain something, and I hope it is clear enough. The study I posted is about fact. It isn't conjecture or economic theory.
There is a problem with the current status quo. For a family of 6 or 2 or 20 to come off programs, the people in the household with earning potential, need to be able to make more via working than via programs. That's a fact. You can argue, but that is a fact. It's a simple numbers game. If programs (A) is more than working (B) then what would any thinking person do? They would take option A as it is larger.
(So far, no "trickle down" economics or the like. Just as issue that needs to be solved, unless we want people to remain on programs long term.)
Agree? If not, please explain.
2. To solve the above issue, in a simple math equation solution when A is more than B and you want to reverse that, you can either raise the amount a job would earn or lower the amount programs give. This also is a fact. It's mathematics. In first grade. Not economist with agenda math. Not new math. The big old > or < math.
It may have a different solution (ask an economist), but the simplest solutions are to raise one or lower the other.
Again, so far, no trickle down economics or other mumbo gumbo. Just math.
3. How do you solve the above issue? This is where economists or conjecture comes in. It seems that the President thinks that we should lower programs. You can argue, and feel that we should raise wages. That is your right to an opinion.
4. You can claim that it is racist and a cover up etc. I can't prove your conspiracy theory wrong. But so far, you've mentioned racism (fact), cover up (fact), you've contradicted your own statements (fact), haven't responded to others (fact), and have labeled others that disagree with you (fact). I don't know for sure, but I think maybe you're thinking a wee bit emotionally, and not logically.
If you'd like to respond, fine, but please don't label me as someone who doesn't care enough, just because I don't think it's a conspiracy or cover up or racist.
I think the President has made an economic decision, that is hurting frum families, but I b'etzem don't disagree with it. I, as well as you, can call my Congressman and ask for him to put some pork barrel into the budget, in order to help frum Yidden. However, I view it as such, not a cover up or ideological attack.