Store Won't Take Returns From Lakewood, Brooklyn, Monsey, Monroe or Passaic

[ya]

untrue. You just painted millions of people with one broad stroke based on nothing but your hateful stereotype which is not based on fact in the slightest.

Land ends in Lakewood,  try returning something to Nordstrand near Lakewood which has the most lens return policy etc...

[mochjas]

Land ends in Lakewood,  try returning something to Nordstrand near Lakewood which has the most lens return policy etc...

I hate to break it to you but Lakewood doesn't represent ALL Jews. It is actually a small percentage. So to throw assumptions at all jews based on one small area is called being anti Semitic

[aygart]

Land ends in Lakewood,  try returning something to Nordstrand near Lakewood which has the most lens return policy etc...

I am sure there are lots of returns. People buy things for a family of ten which the store has no interest in them all coming. When they return a whole pile of stuff it doesn't look good even if they are all brand new.

Just because YOU STEAL and know it is stealing and DO IT ANYWAYS doesn't mean you should mask your guilt by painting everyone as being a gonif like you.

Its literally stealing money out of someones mouth. (i do it as well. just when i do it i know its wrong and if they block me its fair game) dont start screaming at them when all they are doing is protecting their livelihood

[ya]

I hate to break it to you but Lakewood doesn't represent ALL Jews. It is actually a small percentage. So to throw assumptions at all jews based on one small area is called being anti Semitic

Lakewood was just an example.  Same thing near any large Jewish community

[yuneeq]

You know she's lying ? How about giving her the benefit of the doubt. She didn't smear the community. This story got way too big & with everyone calling for a comment she eventually had to respond. She didn't go running to the media. The people abusing her business are the ones smearing the community.

Yes, I know she is lying.
She is claiming her policy of store credit is because Jews return clothing in poor condition way past the return deadline.
I simply don't believe her. Why? Because her return policy clearly states that NO ONE (not even our beloved gentiles) gets a refund of any sort for used or late returns. So she is creating a new version the truth while smearing the community. If she said anything that could be remotely true I would back off.

ETA: I stated this fact about 10x in this thread and not one person has refuted it yet, instead always changing the conversation to some other point. Answer me why she's not a liar without changing the topic.

[aygart]

Yes, I know she is lying.
She is claiming her policy of store credit is because Jews return clothing in poor condition way past the return deadline.

I know that we disagreed about this already, but the way I understood her statement was that her primary issue was people ordering large amounts and returning then even a week later in new condition due to it being am inventory issue. Then she said not only that but often it was late and in poor condition. I know you understood this differently, but that is how I understood it.

[mochjas]

Well if her policy says no returns after 7 days and must be in new condition then why is she taking back late used returns?

[Yehuda57]

Face reality Jews would do anything for a dollar including  stealing. All they need is a way to justify it then it's all good. Shoplifting is hard to justify that's why u don't see it in the frum community that often.

Speak for yourself, you vile, bigoted self-admitted thief.

[TimT]

"New with tags" & "in poor condition" is not a contradiction.

[mochjas]

"New with tags" & "in poor condition" is not a contradiction.

it definitely is. Used with tags isn't the same as new with tags. Also if she only gives 7 days why is she accepting late returns? Something doesn't add up.

[Ergel]

Don't lump your "Jewish" way of life with mine.

+100000

[aygart]

Well if her policy says no returns after 7 days and must be in new condition then why is she taking back late used returns?

that is part of why I think the main issue is even over short periods

[TimT]

it definitely is. Used with tarsis it the same as new with tags.

"New with tags" means it didn't go through the wash & there's no visible stains.
(BTW a tag gun costs about $5 & yes, people have those)

[mochjas]

"New with tags" means it didn't go through the wash & there's no visible stains.
(BTW a tag gun costs about $5 & yes, people have those)

if she can't tell the difference then she should be able to resell it without an issue.

[aygart]

"New with tags" means it didn't go through the wash & there's no visible stains.
(BTW a tag gun costs about $5 & yes, people have those)

and didn't look worn. If it does she should reject the return.

[TimT]

if she can't tell the difference then she should be able to resell it without an issue.

Debate me all you want but I had enough firsthand experience with this. Some items were returned officially "new" but were never resold again.

[ya]

Well if her policy says no returns after 7 days and must be in new condition then why is she taking back late used returns?

She changed her return policy as well

[yuneeq]

I know that we disagreed about this already, but the way I understood her statement was that her primary issue was people ordering large amounts and returning then even a week later in new condition due to it being am inventory issue. Then she said not only that but often it was late and in poor condition. I know you understood this differently, but that is how I understood it.

I agree that the lack of inventory makes sense, which doesn't excuse smearing the community.

[ya]

Speak for yourself, you vile, bigoted self-admitted thief.

Thank you

[ya]

Debate me all you want but I had enough firsthand experience with this. Some items were returned officially "new" but were never resold again.

It's funny how most people with experience on the other side are actually with her on this.  People don't understand.