But BO never lost as was voted in to make those decisions and he wasn't allowed to.
Indeed. But Senate - who was also voted in - decided that he shouldn't be allowed to.
My point only was that there is a tremendous distinction between what happened four years ago and a theoretical nomination before the election, and McConnell is NOT a hypocrite if he confirms said theoretical nomination.
Whether it was the right decision four years ago is not my point. I'm honestly not sure about that. I personally think that there should be some measures to ensure a more balanced decision, like a mandated 60 votes (I don't like that Republicans abolished that). I think Garland may have been a great Justice.