or all down syndrome fetuses
Where will you draw the line of which innocent person should be killed? What about a baby which was born from a rape?
I draw the line by Torah values. What would I answer hypothetically for the politicians?Probably at the point where the baby has brain activity.
According to this the Nazis weren't murderers.
I dont know why this discussion isnt concluded just by looking at a sonogram... as live as can be
fetus is attached to the mother and is living only through her.
At what point is this not true?
When it breaths on it's own independently.
How do we know when that is? Is there any way to really know?
It can't breathe until it is born
That's not what I asked.
Pretty obvious. Can tell by color of the lips and skin. If a baby is blue it means not breathing well on its own.
He did not write about ability.
He is very capable of answering on his own.
What does he need to answer?
It would be a lot easier without you jumping in.
If it is murder then it makes no difference if the baby is from a rape etc. If it is not then it makes no difference if it isn't. Why do some politicians make that distinction?
It's equivocating. Politicians do it all the time. The rape exception arose because in the political discourse, right wing Christians felt that they had to give in to that exception, even though they believe that in the case of rape, or even in the case where a mother's life is in danger, the unborn baby's life comes first.