DansDeals.com Forums

DansDeals Forum => Just Shmooze => Topic started by: Freddie on November 27, 2016, 02:10:19 AM

Title: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Freddie on November 27, 2016, 02:10:19 AM
A poll to ban a troll.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 02:12:10 AM
This seems like a personal attack.

JZT resurrected a two-month-old thread for reasons known only to him, but somehow I'm the troll.

Whatever.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: shulem92 on November 27, 2016, 02:12:30 AM
A poll to ban a troll.
As soon as I get to my computer, I'm voting yes
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Freddie on November 27, 2016, 02:12:48 AM
This seems like a personal attack.

No, nothing personal. You just gotta go.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: David Smith on November 27, 2016, 02:14:31 AM


This seems like a personal attack.

JZT resurrected a two-month-old thread for reasons known only to him, but somehow I'm the troll.

Whatever.

It's nothing personal. You are welcome back in 4 years.
The age minimum to post on DDF is 6.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: shulem92 on November 27, 2016, 02:16:11 AM

It's nothing personal. You are welcome back in 4 years.
LOL . finally a reason to actually laugh!
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 27, 2016, 02:17:25 AM
JZT resurrected a two-month-old thread for reasons known only to him, but somehow I'm the troll.
I corrected info I felt was wrong. I don't care if a thread is two years old. If I come across info I feel is wrong I will correct it.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 02:19:08 AM
I corrected info I felt was wrong. I don't care if a thread is two years old. If I come across info I feel is wrong I will correct it.

You didn't correct anything. You wrongly claimed something was illegal, refused to post the relevant statute, and then got proven wrong when someone else did so.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Freddie on November 27, 2016, 02:20:35 AM
You didn't correct anything. You wrongly claimed something was illegal, refused to post the relevant statute, and then got proven wrong when someone else did so.

Enjoy posting now. Tomorrow you will be banned.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 02:21:56 AM
Enjoy posting now. Tomorrow you will be banned.

Then why does the poll run through Dec. 7?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: aygart on November 27, 2016, 02:22:10 AM
Enjoy posting now. Tomorrow you will be banned.
Eat drink and be merry for tomorrow......
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Freddie on November 27, 2016, 02:22:47 AM
You know what is sad?
After this troll gets banned he will not understand why. He will sincerely think he was banned for being right.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Freddie on November 27, 2016, 02:24:00 AM
Then why does the poll run through Dec. 7?

The same reason our election thread didn't stop after the election. ;D
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 27, 2016, 02:24:33 AM
You didn't correct anything. You wrongly claimed something was illegal, refused to post the relevant statute, and then got proven wrong when someone else did so.
You have zero credibility no matter how many times you repeat the same BS over and over.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 27, 2016, 02:25:09 AM
After this troll gets banned he will not understand why. He will sincerely think he was banned for being right.
This is a real one, LOL!
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: aygart on November 27, 2016, 02:25:47 AM
The same reason our election thread didn't stop after the election. ;D
Jill Stein will sponsor a recount as long as she can raise triple the money needed
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 02:26:13 AM
Anyone who reads the "Dispute hard pull" and the Chase CSR recon threads and thinks *I'm* the troll really needs some help with his reading comprehension.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: aygart on November 27, 2016, 02:27:05 AM
Anyone who reads the "Dispute hard pull" and the Chase CSR recon threads and thinks *I'm* the troll really needs some help with his reading comprehension.
HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 02:27:10 AM
You have zero credibility no matter how many times you repeat the same BS over and over.

The thread speaks for itself. The statute is right there for all to see.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Freddie on November 27, 2016, 02:27:44 AM
Anyone who reads the "Dispute hard pull" and the Chase CSR recon threads and thinks *I'm* the troll really needs some help with his reading comprehension.

Say you're sorry right now and I'll change my vote.
Are you capable? Say you're sorry.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: aygart on November 27, 2016, 02:28:07 AM
The thread speaks for itself. The statute is right there for all to see.
Too much nuance there for you ?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: shulem92 on November 27, 2016, 02:28:15 AM
Anyone who reads the "Dispute hard pull" and the Chase CSR recon threads and thinks *I'm* the troll really needs some help with his reading comprehension.
To be fair, you're allowed to vote in favor of yourself, but democracy is democracy, and the results of the poll will prove who has the reading comprehension issues
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 27, 2016, 02:29:59 AM
The thread speaks for itself. The statute is right there for all to see.
What's not there is you providing one example to back up your position.  :P
Can't forget. LOL
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 02:30:02 AM
Say you're sorry right now and I'll change my vote.
Are you capable? Say you're sorry.

Sorry for what? Defending my position when JZT oddly resurrected a two-month-old thread but then refused to cite any proof in support of his position?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 02:30:32 AM
What's not there is you providing one example to back up your position.  :P
Can't forget. LOL

I can't believe how dishonest this is. Shameless.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: shulem92 on November 27, 2016, 02:32:00 AM



I would think that this thread would be most fitting in either "On the road", " Up in the air", or "Destination guide" thread. Because that's where this guy will be soon...
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: David Smith on November 27, 2016, 02:32:12 AM
I can't believe how dishonest this is. Shameless.
Don't worry, Mr. LOL. You still have hope. You can grow up to be the president of the USA one day.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 27, 2016, 02:34:34 AM
Don't worry, Mr. LOL. You still have hope. You can grow up to be the president of the USA one day.
Oh no, could it be him?  :)
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: aygart on November 27, 2016, 02:35:27 AM
Oh no, could it be him?  :)
No way. Trump is very thick skinned compared to this guy.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 02:38:44 AM
No way. Trump is very thick skinned compared to this guy.

Wait, now *I'm* thin-skinned?

The sheer amount of dishonesty here is incredible.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: aygart on November 27, 2016, 02:40:21 AM
Wait, now *I'm* thin-skinned?

The sheer amount of dishonesty here is incredible.
You demonstrated it with this post. I can recommend a good dermatologist for you.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: shulem92 on November 27, 2016, 02:40:45 AM
Wait, now *I'm* thin-skinned?

The sheer amount of dishonesty here is incredible.
Dishonesty. Go back through all the threads that you've fought in, and you will see how fast you lost your cool!
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 27, 2016, 02:40:52 AM
The sheer amount of dishonesty here is incredible.
Show how honest you are. You claim I "filled up your PM's". How many was that?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 02:41:23 AM
Dishonesty. Go back through all the threads that you've fought in, and you will see how fast you lost your cool!

How about posting a couple citations? Thanks in advance.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 02:42:07 AM
Show how honest you are. You claim I "filled up your PM's". How many was that?

You sent a bunch, right after self-righteously announcing that you were done with the discussion.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: aygart on November 27, 2016, 02:42:55 AM
How about posting a couple citations? Thanks in advance.
Long list here (http://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=26227)
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: aygart on November 27, 2016, 02:43:20 AM
You sent a bunch, right after self-righteously announcing that you were done with the discussion.
numbers numbers numbers
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 27, 2016, 02:48:07 AM
You sent a bunch, right after self-righteously announcing that you were done with the discussion.
What I posted was my quote from the other thread that I did not post in any further. If you think you are going to post anything about PM's and get away with it you are living in fantasy land. Now it is a "bunch" instead of "filled up my PM". So how many we talking about?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: shulem92 on November 27, 2016, 02:49:32 AM


So how many we talking about?

@jtz I don't trust that guy with an honest answer, so would you mind telling us. I would like to go to sleep already
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 02:51:39 AM
What I posted was my quote from the other thread that I did not post in any further. If you think you are going to post anything about PM's and get away with it you are living in fantasy land. Now it is a "bunch" instead of "filled up my PM". So how many we talking about?

It was a bunch, in a short amount of time, after saying you were done. And you know it.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: mmgfarb on November 27, 2016, 02:52:14 AM
It was a bunch, in a short amount of time, after saying you were done. And you know it.
How many?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 02:53:52 AM
How many?

A bunch.

You guys wouldn't give me an estimate of the recon success rate after five failed calls, and you pretended not to know what "rare" meant, so I guess two can play that game.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: mmgfarb on November 27, 2016, 02:54:39 AM
A bunch.

You guys wouldn't give me an estimate of the recon success rate after five failed calls, and you pretended not to know what "rare" meant, so I guess two can play that game.
Whatever...........................................
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 27, 2016, 02:55:50 AM
It was a bunch, in a short amount of time, after saying you were done. And you know it.
Gives us a number? What are you so afraid of. Oh I get it. You can't BS your way out of this one because there is a paper trail but I can call you out on it. You are liar that I "filled up you PM's". What you going to do? LOL
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 02:59:30 AM
Gives us a number? What are you so afraid of. Oh I get it. You can't BS your way out of this one because there is a paper trail but I can call you out on it. You are liar that I "filled up you PM's". What you going to do? LOL

The guy who resurrected an old thread but then refused to post the legal citation he insisted existed now thinks he's entitled to make demands. Funny.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Brian93 on November 27, 2016, 03:00:14 AM


Wrong. And sad. Totally dishonest and unfair.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 27, 2016, 03:04:35 AM
The guy who resurrected an old thread but then refused to post the legal citation he insisted existed now thinks he's entitled to make demands. Funny.
I am the one calling you a LIAR!!! You have a couple of choices.
1 - Post the number and be confirmed a liar.
2 - Put your head between your legs and leave quietly.
3 - Be hounded every time you post.
Don't forget LOL
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 03:06:35 AM
I am the one calling you a LIAR!!! You have a couple of choices.
1 - Post the number and be confirmed a liar.
2 - Put your head between your legs and leave quietly.
3 - Be hounded every time you post.
Don't forget LOL

Being called a "liar" by a liar means nothing to me. And if I get banned, I get banned. But there's no way in hell that *I* was the one acting like a "troll" in the two threads in question tonight.

You got proven wrong, you didn't like it, and things went off the rails. But don't put this on me. I'm not the one who resurrected a two-month-old thread but then refused to back up my position with anything resembling a legal citation. That was you.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 27, 2016, 03:09:31 AM
Being called a "liar" by a liar means nothing to me. And if I get banned, I get banned. But there's no way in hell that *I* was the one acting like a "troll" in the two threads in question tonight.

You got proven wrong, you didn't like it, and things went off the rails. But don't put this on me.
I don't want you banned. I believe you can be saved with the 10 step program. Step 1 you have to admit you have a problem. They all know now that you are a liar so will work on that latter.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 03:12:29 AM
I don't want you banned. I believe you can be saved with the 10 step program. Step 1 you have to admit you have a problem. They all know now that you are a liar so will work on that latter.

I don't have a problem. I was right two months ago, and I was right earlier tonight, as the posted legal citation proved.

Most people with a scintilla of integrity would have simply dropped it. Instead, you went kind of nuts over nothing.

People are siding with you because you're a member of the clique here and I'm a newbie, but the facts are the facts.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 27, 2016, 03:15:03 AM
You can keep posting all the BS you want. You can't even back up your PM claim. Just admit it wasn't true and move on.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 03:17:34 AM
You can keep posting all the BS you want. You can't even back up your PM claim. Just admit it wasn't true and move on.

I haven't posted any B.S.

Unlike you, I've actually posted actual arguments in support of my positions.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 27, 2016, 03:19:30 AM
Unlike you, I've actually posted actual arguments in support of my positions.
How can anyone believe a word you say when you lie?  :P
I keep forgetting LOL
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: A3 on November 27, 2016, 08:01:44 AM
You guys are the worst, now everyone wants to read another thread to see what's going on. All while knowing it will just go in circles.
Lol
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Yordai Dooma on November 27, 2016, 08:50:08 AM
You guys are the worst, now everyone wants to read another thread to see what's going on. All while knowing it will just go in circles.
Lol
+1
Can we have some cliff notes
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Sport on November 27, 2016, 08:55:49 AM
+1
Can we have some cliff notes
It's all in this thread.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Dr Moose on November 27, 2016, 08:57:10 AM
+1
Can we have some cliff notes
Here too. I don't have the patience to read those threads.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: rileywiles23 on November 27, 2016, 11:08:13 AM
This guy is worse then AJ.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: aygart on November 27, 2016, 05:16:32 PM
He's baaaaaaccccckkkkk
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Freddie on November 27, 2016, 05:25:24 PM
Mods?
What's happening with this?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 05:28:42 PM
Mods?
What's happening with this?

What's happening with what? You guys are the ones belaboring this in multiple threads, despite your alleged desire for all of this to stop.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 27, 2016, 05:46:17 PM
He's baaaaaaccccckkkkk
Trashing threads again. LOL
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 27, 2016, 05:47:17 PM
Trashing threads again. LOL

Which threads have I "trashed" today? Please post links.

Here are my posts from today:

http://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=26227 (http://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=26227)
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: good sam on November 27, 2016, 08:41:49 PM

Wrong. And sad. Totally dishonest and unfair.
*Like*
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: aygart on November 27, 2016, 08:51:27 PM
Which threads have I "trashed" today? Please post links.

Here are my posts from today:

http://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=26227 (http://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=26227)
These
http://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=26227

:P
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: yakov116 on November 28, 2016, 12:09:10 AM
Could be
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 28, 2016, 09:27:04 AM
Cross posting from the credit thread.

It's illegal for anyone to pull even a soft of your credit without a permissible purpose.
Here is another 100% false statement. Softs are pulled all the time without you having anything to do with institution that is pulling the soft. Here is something you can do yourself to prove what I am saying is correct. Get a real copy of your CR and look under inquires. It will show soft and hard inquires. Under soft inquires you most likely see pulls you never gave permission to or ever had anything to do with. Here are few under mine.

PRM-AAA AUTO CLUB GROUP 10/24/16
PRM-LIBERTY MUTUAL RESPONSE MARKET 10/21/16
PRM ONL-WYNDHAM VACATION OWNERSHIP 07/31/16

Most of you would say what is the big deal? Just let the troll keep trolling. The problem is he continually posts wrong information in this and other threads that can get members in trouble. When you correct him with facts he just keeps repeating the same BS over and over.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: chevron on November 28, 2016, 09:57:13 AM
Why wasent I banned ?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 28, 2016, 09:59:26 AM
Why wasent I banned ?
I was thinking the same thing (for me not you).  :)
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: David Smith on November 28, 2016, 09:59:27 AM
Why wasent I banned ?
You know wine.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Emkay on November 28, 2016, 10:00:02 AM
Why wasent I banned ?
Because I'm not a mod.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Freddie on November 28, 2016, 12:01:48 PM
And if I were a mod, you would ALL be banned and I would just post all day to myself!!!
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: aygart on November 28, 2016, 12:05:26 PM
It is a shame because it does seem that if he would be able to have a straight conversation and be less argumentative and condescending he would have what to offer.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: good sam on November 28, 2016, 12:10:47 PM
Why wasent I banned ?
Because you're not belligerent AND you're controversial, which makes you a perfect fit.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: mmgfarb on November 28, 2016, 01:15:57 PM
It is a shame because it does seem that if he would be able to have a straight conversation and be less argumentative and condescending he would have what to offer.
+1
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Freddie on November 28, 2016, 01:24:46 PM
It is a shame because it does seem that if he would be able to have a straight conversation and be less argumentative and condescending he would have what to offer.

I agree. He seems like a smart guy and he has some experience in areas that are of interest to many of us. But his lack of basic social skills are UNCONSCIONABLE. He is a troll of the trolliest magnitude and should be banned. Let him be humbled and come back with a new user name and behave like a normal human being.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: EJB on November 28, 2016, 01:37:41 PM
Can someone post a wiki here
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: myi on November 28, 2016, 01:52:50 PM
So when is a DDF law-firm opening, you guys are doing great as a team.

 Would love to see played out in real life.  ;)
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 28, 2016, 03:03:06 PM
Cross posting from the credit thread.
Here is another 100% false statement. Softs are pulled all the time without you having anything to do with institution that is pulling the soft. Here is something you can do yourself to prove what I am saying is correct. Get a real copy of your CR and look under inquires. It will show soft and hard inquires. Under soft inquires you most likely see pulls you never gave permission to or ever had anything to do with. Here are few under mine.

PRM-AAA AUTO CLUB GROUP 10/24/16
PRM-LIBERTY MUTUAL RESPONSE MARKET 10/21/16
PRM ONL-WYNDHAM VACATION OWNERSHIP 07/31/16

Most of you would say what is the big deal? Just let the troll keep trolling. The problem is he continually posts wrong information in this and other threads that can get members in trouble. When you correct him with facts he just keeps repeating the same BS over and over.

LOL. My statement that you quoted was 100% CORRECT.

"Permissible purpose" doesn't mean that the person gave permission for the soft pull.

Seriously, you should get a clue before popping off in such a strident manner. Dozens of posts later and you still don't have the first clue of what the hell you're talking about.

(And by the way, I'm sure many of the people who read JTZ's comment above knew it was wrong. It's sad that none of JTZ's buddies had the strength of character to correct him.)
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: yakov116 on November 28, 2016, 03:09:00 PM
LOL. My statement that you quoted was 100% CORRECT.

"Permissible purpose" doesn't mean that the person gave permission for the soft pull.

Seriously, you should get a clue before popping off in such a strident manner. Dozens of posts later and you still don't have the first clue of what the hell you're talking about.

(And by the way, I'm sure many of the people who read JTZ's comment above knew it was wrong. It's sad that none of JTZ's buddies had the strength of character to correct him.)
Yo SHUT UP SHUT UP
GET A LIFE NOT EVERY THING YOU NEED TO ANSWER BACK
GROW UP
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 28, 2016, 03:15:59 PM
Yo SHUT UP SHUT UP
GET A LIFE NOT EVERY THING YOU NEED TO ANSWER BACK
GROW UP

LOL. If you had any integrity, you'd be addressing this to the guy who cross-posted his 100% wrong "gotcha" attempt in two different threads in an attempt to keep this nonsense going.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: mmgfarb on November 28, 2016, 03:18:17 PM
Who exactly are JTZ's buddies?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: David Smith on November 28, 2016, 03:22:56 PM


(And by the way, I'm sure many of the people who read JTZ's comment above knew it was wrong. It's sad that none of JTZ's buddies had the strength of character to correct him.)


LOL. Are you insane? Even your buddies pointed out that you were dead wrong.


Schizophrenia is a treatable condition. Possibly you should look into it.

Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: CreamofSoup on November 28, 2016, 03:24:00 PM


Schizophrenia is a treatable condition. Possibly you should look into it.

Why treat something that entertains this much?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 28, 2016, 03:24:54 PM


Schizophrenia is a treatable condition. Possibly you should look into it.

Huh? I hadn't been to the other thread when I posted the first comment, and it remains true that no one corrected JTZ in *this* thread.

Nice try, though.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: username on November 28, 2016, 03:26:42 PM
.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 28, 2016, 03:29:57 PM
What name do I put for member, LOL?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: username on November 28, 2016, 03:44:45 PM
All active ones. Ask Chaim to Help you Count.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Baruch on November 28, 2016, 03:48:04 PM
There should be an option in the poll, that we should just ban him if he doesn't stop writing LOL.
It literally drives me nuts.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: username on November 28, 2016, 03:55:02 PM
There should be an option in the poll, that we should just ban him if he doesn't stop writing LOL.
It literally drives me nuts.
LOL
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: yakov116 on November 28, 2016, 04:00:09 PM
.
Thanks
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 12:57:45 AM
Now this guy is trashing the CSR thread. He just can't let things go.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: good sam on November 29, 2016, 01:01:10 AM
All active ones. Ask Chaim to Help you Count.
Like
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 29, 2016, 01:38:39 AM
Now this guy is trashing the CSR thread. He just can't let things go.

We need a new poll:

Is JTZ the biggest liar on the site or is he the biggest liar on the site?

I guess it wasn't enough that he utterly humiliated himself in not one but two threads yesterday as part of his odd obsession with trying to make me look bad. Now he's lying again in a thread that had been dormant for 9 hours to try to change the subject away from his own self-inflicted humiliation. Sad.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 01:47:05 AM
We need a new poll:

Is JTZ the biggest liar on the site or is he the biggest liar on the site?

I guess it wasn't enough that he utterly humiliated himself in not one but two threads yesterday as part of his odd obsession with trying to make me look bad. Now he's lying again in a thread that had been dormant for 9 hours to try to change the subject away from his own self-inflicted humiliation. Sad.
The bottom line is we can say anything we want. The members will decide who is being honest.

You keep arguing the same point over and over now in the CSR thread. Members can read it and decide for themselves. What we say doesn't matter. They are smart enough to figure things out on their own.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: mmgfarb on November 29, 2016, 01:48:19 AM
I think both of you need to just give it a rest, this argument is going nowhere.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 01:49:09 AM
I think both of you need to just give it a rest, this argument is going nowhere.
Let him vent here. Better than him trashing other threads.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 29, 2016, 01:52:45 AM
The bottom line is we can say anything we want. The members will decide who is being honest.

You keep arguing the same point over and over now in the CSR thread. Members can read it and decide for themselves. What we say doesn't matter. They are smart enough to figure things out on their own.

My last comment in the CSR thread was *four hours* before you came into this thread and dishonestly claimed I was currently "trashing the CSR thread."

You're an incredibly dishonest person. It's hard to imagine there could be someone on this site more blatantly dishonest than you. If you're going to lie, you should at least be smart enough to lie about things that can't be easily verified with a couple clicks.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: mmgfarb on November 29, 2016, 01:53:34 AM
My last comment in the CSR thread was *four hours* before you came into this thread and dishonestly claimed I was currently "trashing the CSR thread."

You're an incredibly dishonest person. It's hard to imagine there could be someone on this site more blatantly dishonest than you. If you're going to lie, you should at least be smart enough to lie about things that can't be easily verified with a couple clicks.
I think both of you need to just give it a rest, this argument is going nowhere.

Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 29, 2016, 01:54:10 AM
Let him vent here. Better than him trashing other threads.

Which thread was I "trashing" at 12:57 a.m., when you saw fit to resurrect this dormant thread to lie about me?

Please post a link.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: mmgfarb on November 29, 2016, 01:54:31 AM
Which thread was I "trashing" at 12:57 a.m., when you saw fit to resurrect this dormant thread?

Please post a link, liar.
I think both of you need to just give it a rest, this argument is going nowhere.

Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 01:54:42 AM
My last comment in the CSR thread was *four hours* before you came into this thread and dishonestly claimed I was currently "trashing the CSR thread."
I appreciate you keeping your personal attacks here instead of trashing other threads.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 29, 2016, 01:56:32 AM
I appreciate you keeping your personal attacks here instead of trashing other threads.

I'll ask again: Which thread was I "trashing" at 12:57 a.m.?

Put up or shut up.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 01:58:18 AM
I'll ask again:
You can ask all you want. I just ask you to post all your trash in this thread from now own.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: mmgfarb on November 29, 2016, 01:59:04 AM
You can ask all you want. I just ask you to post all your trash in this thread from now own.
I'll ask again: Which thread was I "trashing" at 12:57 a.m.?

Put up or shut up.
I think both of you need to just give it a rest, this argument is going nowhere.

Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 02:08:15 AM
Please post a link.
Here is just one example.
There *is* no "power of HUCA."
You want to keep arguing about the power of HUCA. To me that is trashing a thread when it is a known fact it works. You just can't let it go.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 29, 2016, 02:09:54 AM
Here is just one example.You want to keep arguing about the power of HUCA. To me that is trashing a thread when it is a known fact it works. You just can't let it go.

*I* "just can't let it go"?

Physician, heal thyself. Seriously.

You're acting so obsessively toward me, I'm starting to wonder if I'll need a restraining order.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 02:12:04 AM
Just keep it to this thread so you don't trash others and we are good.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 29, 2016, 02:17:20 AM
Just keep it to this thread so you don't trash others and we are good.

You're in no position to ask me to do anything, so I couldn't care less if "we are good."

With your personal attacks, your lying, and your cross-posting of comments (e.g., reply #66), you've violated a lot more rules here than I have.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 02:21:18 AM
...and the hits just keep on coming. Just keep them here and we are all good. Maybe if you get it all out tonight we will be good going forward.  :)
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 29, 2016, 02:22:34 AM
...and the hits just keep on coming. Just keep them here and we are all good. Maybe if you get it all out tonight we will be good going forward.  :)

I have nothing to "get out." As with the other thread that you resurrected after two months of dormancy, you were the one who resurrected this dormant thread earlier tonight just so you could lie about me.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 02:24:16 AM
You sure are doing a lot of posting for having nothing to get out.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 29, 2016, 02:29:32 AM
You sure are doing a lot of posting for having nothing to get out.

What was it someone was saying about being passive-aggressive?

Resurrecting a dormant thread and then complaining that someone is posting in it probably qualifies.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 02:30:58 AM
This isn't a dormant thread. You have a weird way of looking at things. Do you know what JS (this forum) is for?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: mmgfarb on November 29, 2016, 02:33:07 AM
This isn't a dormant thread. You have a weird way of looking at things. Do you know what JS (this forum) is for?
Take a look at my signature
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 29, 2016, 02:33:48 AM
This isn't a dormant thread. You have a weird way of looking at things. Do you know what JS (this forum) is for?

Nobody had posted in this thread for 9 hours when you resurrected it to falsely claim I was currently "trashing" a CSR thread, which was yet another of your bald-faced lies.

One minute, people want this discussion to die; the next minute, they're resurrecting dormant threads just to lie. Bizarre behavior.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 02:36:31 AM
Nobody had posted in this thread for 9 hours
So when a thread hasn't been posted in for 9 hours it is dormant? If that is the case I can show you hundreds of what you call dormant threads that I never posted in. Like I said you have a weird way of looking at things.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 29, 2016, 02:37:46 AM
So when a thread hasn't been posted in for 9 hours it is dormant? If that is the case I can show you hundreds of what you call dormant threads that I never posted in. Like I said you have a weird way of looking at things.

Yes, it was dormant. People wanted the discussion to die, it had died, and you resurrected it for no reason, just so you could lie about me.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 02:38:09 AM
One minute, people want this discussion to die; the next minute, they're resurrecting dormant threads just to lie. Bizarre behavior.
I want valuable threads not to be trashed. Post anything you want here. I appreciate you sticking to this so far.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 02:39:24 AM
Yes, it was dormant.
Most here would not consider this thread to be dormant.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 29, 2016, 02:40:27 AM
Most here would not consider this thread to be dormant.

The people who were busy not posting in this thread for the 9 hours from 4:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. Eastern time?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 02:42:14 AM
The people who were busy not posting in this thread for the 9 hours from 4:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. Eastern time?
You are assuming everyone is on this forum 24/7.

Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 29, 2016, 02:43:12 AM
You are assuming everyone is on this forum 24/7.

No, I'm not. Regardless, there's a lot of traffic on this site between those hours. And yet, as is your very odd habit, you were once again the one to resurrect the discussion when everyone else was content to let it die.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 02:45:18 AM
No, I'm not. Regardless, there's a lot of traffic on this site between those hours.
Just look at this thread right on the JS forum. It goes days without posts then gets busy again. No one is claiming they are resurrecting a dormant thread. Like I said you have a weird way of looking at things.
http://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?topic=39212.0
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jsk173 on November 29, 2016, 02:47:20 AM
Just look at this thread right on the JS forum. It goes days without posts then gets busy again. No one is claiming they are resurrecting a dormant thread. Like I said you have a weird way of looking at things.
http://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?topic=39212.0

Were a lot of people on the record as wanting that discussion to die?

This thread, and the other one, are chock full of people who want the discussion to die, and yet, like an obsessed weirdo, you keep resurrecting them for stupid reasons.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Yammer on November 29, 2016, 02:50:15 AM
Can everyone just stop???


Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 02:50:23 AM
Were a lot of people on the record as wanting that discussion to die?
Have no idea. I should point out to you this poll is open for more than another week. You are doing very well in the poll. For the record I didn't vote to have you banned. If you haven't figured it out yet you are my Mississippi.  :)
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 02:51:13 AM
Can everyone just stop???😠😠
It is 2:00am in the morning in JS. What do you want me to do, work?  :)
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: aygart on November 29, 2016, 09:15:16 AM
Yes, it was dormant. People wanted the discussion to die, it had died, and you resurrected it for no reason, just so you could lie about me.
And what do you think would have happened had he done that and you kept quiet?

Maybe you should see a dermatologist about your thin skin. As I wrote elsewhere you are making Trump look thick skinned.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: aygart on November 29, 2016, 09:16:36 AM
you've violated a lot more rules here than I have.
JTZ? Rules? That really deserves an LOL

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: ExGingi on November 29, 2016, 10:03:10 AM
I think both of you need to just give it a rest, this argument is going nowhere.
As I've pointed out several times, that seems to be by design. That's a favorite destination of jsk173. I have no idea why others try to hop on for the ride.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 10:06:24 AM
I am going on the premise we all got it out of our system (including me) and now we can move forward. How about we let this die and see what happens?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: ExGingi on November 29, 2016, 10:17:46 AM
I am going on the premise we all got it out of our system (including me) and now we can move forward. How about we let this die and see what happens?
It took you this long? OTC laxatives didn't work? Maybe it's time to see a gastro!
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: aygart on November 29, 2016, 10:27:49 AM
I am going on the premise we all got it out of our system (including me) and now we can move forward. How about we let this die and see what happens?
Good idea. Maybe we should let him catch his breath, take a few xanax, have some quiet time, and a visit to the dermatologist. Maybe afterwards he will be able to hold a normal conversation. If he would he seems to have what to offer.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 10:29:58 AM
Good idea. Maybe we should let him catch his breath, take a few xanax, have some quiet time, and a visit to the dermatologist. Maybe afterwards he will be able to hold a normal conversation. If he would he seems to have what to offer.
Lets put the blame on me for all this. Time to move forward!
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: aygart on November 29, 2016, 10:31:50 AM
Lets put the blame on me for all this. Time to move forward!
I think this is one we did together.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: mmgfarb on November 29, 2016, 10:34:02 AM
"Stronger together" or "Make JS great again" ? :P
I'm going with make JS great again.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: ExGingi on November 29, 2016, 10:34:26 AM
Good idea. Maybe we should let him catch his breath, take a few xanax, have some quiet time, and a visit to the dermatologist. Maybe afterwards he will be able to hold a normal conversation. If he would he seems to have what to offer.
Starting to look like a nurse's hotline.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 10:35:51 AM
This isn't what I meant with let it die.  >:(
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: ExGingi on November 29, 2016, 10:41:41 AM
This isn't what I meant with let it die.  >:(
How can it die when good members chime in with medical advice to save its life?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Redbull3 on November 29, 2016, 10:43:50 AM
AJK on steroids + LOL = Jsk173. A tad abrasive - probably only crossed the line with the PM thing - but I give him a pass as he's been on the defensive from multiple members who've ganged up on him and more than held his own. Kind of an underdog. Please don't ban him, and don't let this die... I come to DDF for my daily escape with my popcorn ready for drama like this... keep it going!
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 10:47:27 AM
AJK on steroids + LOL = Jsk173. A tad abrasive - probably only crossed the line with the PM thing - but I give him a pass as he's been on the defensive from multiple members who've ganged up on him and more than held his own. Kind of an underdog. Please don't ban him, and don't let this die... I come to DDF for my daily escape with my popcorn ready for drama like this... keep it going!
If you feel that way we should try and get HelpMe back. Talk about being abrasive.  :)
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: David Smith on November 29, 2016, 10:48:26 AM


AJ on steroids + LOL = Jsk173. A tad abrasive - probably only crossed the line with the PM thing - but I give him a pass as he's been on the defensive from multiple members who've ganged up on him and more than held his own. Kind of an underdog. Please don't ban him, and don't let this die... I come to DDF for my daily escape with my popcorn ready for drama like this... keep it going!

FTFY
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Redbull3 on November 29, 2016, 10:51:57 AM
If you feel that way we should try and get HelpMe back. Talk about being abrasive.  :)
You are the DDF michael jackson, the undisputed king of pop(corn), and have nothing but love for you JTZ! But I find myself partial to JSK in most of these debates lol.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Redbull3 on November 29, 2016, 10:52:28 AM

FTFY
AJ?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 10:54:57 AM
But I find myself partial to JSK in most of these debates lol.
Now I know I am right.  :P   :)
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: David Smith on November 29, 2016, 10:57:10 AM
You are the DDF michael jackson, the undisputed king of pop(corn), and have nothing but love for you JTZ! But I find myself partial to JSK in most of these debates lol.
"You're fat."
"Your mom is fatter."

doesn't constitute a debate in my books.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Redbull3 on November 29, 2016, 10:57:42 AM
Now I know I am right.  :P   :)
LOL.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: username on November 29, 2016, 10:58:32 AM
AJ?
http://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?action=profile;u=10826
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Redbull3 on November 29, 2016, 10:58:37 AM
"You're fat."
"Your mom is fatter."

doesn't constitute a debate in my books.
Why not? It's certainly not an agreement!
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: David Smith on November 29, 2016, 11:01:37 AM
Why not? It's certainly not an agreement!
It's technically not a disagreement either....
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Redbull3 on November 29, 2016, 11:01:42 AM
http://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?action=profile;u=10826
I hear, but I meant AJK, with the snark/legalese/perfect grammar/condescension/etc
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 11:09:04 AM
"You're fat."
"Your mom is fatter."

doesn't constitute a debate in my books.
You don't ever bring someone's Mom into it.  >:( >:( >:(
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: chocolate on November 29, 2016, 11:48:17 AM
Maybe JTZ is the troll??? ::) :P :o -

I think I just wasted too much time reading all of this...shoot, now there will be a poll asking if I should be banned.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Dan on November 29, 2016, 12:04:06 PM
I hear, but I meant AJK, with the snark/legalese/perfect grammar/condescension/etc
I actually thought of some combination of the 2 of them.

FWIW I asked jsk173 to lay off the personal attacks a couple of nights ago.

We should be able to disagree without resorting to name calling.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: yakov116 on November 29, 2016, 12:10:51 PM
I actually thought of some combination of the 2 of them.

FWIW I asked jsk173 to lay off the personal attacks a couple of nights ago.

We should be able to disagree without resorting to name calling.
The issue is not name calling it the fact that he cannot follow a conversation and that he has to say the last word.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jj1000 on November 29, 2016, 12:11:48 PM
I hear, but I meant AJK, with the snark/legalese/perfect grammar/condescension/etc
The vast majority of members here don't remember the AJK of 3 or 4 years ago. So they wouldn't understand.

I actually thought of some combination of the 2 of them.

FWIW I asked jsk173 to lay off the personal attacks a couple of nights ago.

We should be able to disagree without resorting to name calling.
Steve2? :)
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: JTZ on November 29, 2016, 12:13:27 PM
The vast majority of members here don't remember the AJK of 3 or 4 years ago. So they wouldn't understand.
 
Maybe update us?  :)
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: jj1000 on November 29, 2016, 12:14:38 PM
Maybe update us?  :)
I'm sure you get the gist now, much like HM I suppose, very smart and liked to argue.
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Luvtotravel on November 29, 2016, 12:18:36 PM
I'm sure you get the gist now, much like HM I suppose, very smart and liked to argue.
HM?
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: yakov116 on November 29, 2016, 12:19:49 PM
HM?
Help Me
http://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?action=profile;u=4607
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Redbull3 on November 29, 2016, 01:45:15 PM
It's funny, I never picked up on a difference in style between HM vs the other versions...
Title: Re: Should jsk173 be banned?
Post by: Freddie on November 29, 2016, 02:50:22 PM
It's funny, I never picked up on a difference in style between HM vs the other versions...

Lehavdil! One of them was Jewish!