Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member.


Messages - dpk4588

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 87
2
Just Shmooze / Re: Super Bowl 2020
« on: February 03, 2020, 12:17:44 AM »

3
Destination Guides And Trip Planning / Re: Atlantic City Master Thread
« on: January 27, 2020, 02:25:16 PM »
12/31/19 was the last day
Oh. Sad. At least I wasn't so out of date.

4
Destination Guides And Trip Planning / Re: Atlantic City Master Thread
« on: January 27, 2020, 02:22:52 PM »
not anymore
I haven't done it since shortly after it opened, but when did it stop?

5
Destination Guides And Trip Planning / Re: Atlantic City Master Thread
« on: January 27, 2020, 02:17:44 PM »
Hi,
 The wife and I are looking to go to the AC for a few nights. Can someone help us choose which hotel to stay at? We are more interested in getting nice rooms and access to a nice spa than the casino. I've been told to go to the Borgata or Resorts but the opinions are a bit dated.
Ocean is also nice and can be booked with Hyatt points IIRC.

6
Just Shmooze / Re: MLB Master Thread
« on: January 27, 2020, 01:28:19 PM »

Overdue

7
Deals/Deal Requests / Re: Shutterfly Master Thread
« on: January 23, 2020, 11:12:01 AM »
Groupon regularly has these deals where you can buy an 8x8 book for $5. In the past when I've had free 8x8 book codes, it just took $17.99 off the price of my total book (since I order the 8x11). Does anyone have any experience with these Groupons? Do they work the same way, meaning can I add these to my account and the have them reduce the cost of my 8x11 book by $17.99?
I just found out the hard way (by trying) that Groupons won't work the same way as the free 8x8 books which just lower the price by $17.99. They only work on 8x8 books.

8
Deals/Deal Requests / Re: Shutterfly Master Thread
« on: January 23, 2020, 09:46:20 AM »
Groupon regularly has these deals where you can buy an 8x8 book for $5. In the past when I've had free 8x8 book codes, it just took $17.99 off the price of my total book (since I order the 8x11). Does anyone have any experience with these Groupons? Do they work the same way, meaning can I add these to my account and the have them reduce the cost of my 8x11 book by $17.99?

9
Code FREEPAGES.

Plus 40-50% off everything, no code needed.

Stack with Amex offer (I think it was $5 back on $20+)

10
Just Shmooze / Re: NHL Master Thread
« on: January 22, 2020, 02:01:46 PM »
I was actually at that game, and at first, it had seemed that the puck was dropped and then they started fighting. I think after the Johnston / Haley fight, the refs wanted to send a message.
I'm not sure it was as much about sending a message as I think that's one of those rules where they can't not call it, like a puck out of play from the d-zone.

11
Just Shmooze / Re: NHL Master Thread
« on: January 22, 2020, 01:11:06 PM »
Scott Mayfield isn't a dirty player, while Brendan Lemieux is known to have similar skill to his father in getting under people's skin.
While I agree that Mayfield isn't a dirty player and Lemieux is known as an agitator, Mayfield should know better. Late in a game, up 4-0 after having had two tough losses to the Rangers last week and the blown lead in the 3rd vs the Caps on Sat, that's not a situation to take a dumb penalty. Also, after the play, right in front of the ref, there's no way they can't call something on that, regardless of who was involved.
This doesn't really seem like a spear at all - A spear is called when you essentially try to push your stick through an opponent like a nail or an ice pick. The motion by Mayfield here looks more like a slash, which makes it even more confusing. It also seems that Lemiuex embellished (look at the delay between the slash/spear and him falling down).
It looked like a textbook spear to me. The definition of a spear is literally "stabbing an opponent with the point of the stick blade," while this was more of a poke than a stab, it was pretty clearly a spear. But I agree that it looked embellished.
From last night's game - if you commit an icing, and the other team calls a timeout, you still need to put out all of the players that were on the ice for the icing. If not you get assessed a bench minor for a delay of game (happened to the Isles with 3:20 left in last night's game).
That wasn't exactly what happened. The isles iced it, so regardless of the Rangers having called time out, the 5 guys who were on the ice, need to stay on the ice. I don't remember exactly what happened, I think the Isles just sent one of the guys (I think Cizikas) out late and the refs thought it was a late change, so they sent him back, but then the refs realized it was after an icing so the original guys needed to be on the ice. They weren't given the delay of game for having the wrong personnel, it was more for not fixing the errors fast enough, it looked like they were trying to stall after an icing (which made no sense because they just had a timeout called by the Rangers). They'll sometimes give those delay of games when after multiple icings when a team is really tired, the team will play games, with equipment changes "oh I need a new stick and didn't realize for the last 15 seconds". This was different, I didn't think the isles were playing games, and I was pretty surprised, Wes McCauley of all people, called that. The whole situation was weird and it was a stupid penalty.
- From the game last Monday night (the first Isles/Rangers game): If a second fight occurs during the same stoppage of play, the players are given automatic game misconducts - this happened to Matt Martin and Brendan Smith on the ensuing faceoff after the Haley/Johnston fight.
They didn't really intend to. They waited to fight, the ref kinda faked them out on the faceoff, so they though he dropped it, so they started fighting, I think they were both making an effort to wait until the puck dropped.

12
Just Shmooze / Re: NHL Master Thread
« on: January 22, 2020, 11:02:26 AM »
Either way the rule is stupid. No way is that a double minor. A crosscheck in the back is ten times worse than that tap.
I agree. I was confused why they called a double minor, that's why I looked up the rule to see if it was required by rule, but now I'm more confused.

13
Just Shmooze / Re: NHL Master Thread
« on: January 22, 2020, 10:43:09 AM »
He flinched and fell down.
Maybe I'm biased because I'm an isles fan, but I thought it looked like a dive before I saw the replay, and the replay made it look even worse.

14
Just Shmooze / Re: NHL Master Thread
« on: January 22, 2020, 10:14:17 AM »
Interesting thing happened in the isles/rangers game last night. At 12:39 of the 3rd Scott Mayfield got called for spearing Brendan Lemieux. He got a double minor, but I was looking at the rules, and rule 62.2 says a double major if no contact is made, and 62.3 says a major for a player who spears (it doesnt say anything about making contact, so I'm assuming it means if contact is made contrasting it to rule 62.2). Here's where it gets interesting. Lemieux falls as a result of the spearing, I couldn't tell if he actually made contact or not (from the replay it looks like he did), but if he did, it should have been a major on Mayfield, if he missed, Lemieux should have been called for embellishment, because I'm pretty sure that would be the definition of taking a dive if you fall from some attempting to spear you and missing. Thoughts?


15
Just Shmooze / Re: NHL Master Thread
« on: January 20, 2020, 05:06:34 PM »
The more areas you excel in the greater player you will be. Like this guy I heard of called MJ.  ;)
That's a nice idea, but we're not talking about who is an all-time great hockey player, we were comparing Kane & Towes. Also does Towes excel in those areas? Or were you just commenting on the fact that I was only using number as a way to compare two players?

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 87