Iran's Top Terrorist Taken Out By The U.S.

[yuneeq]

It’s 4 days later and I still don’t see any war. So we’re right back at square 1 except for 1 very pulverized terrorist.

All the TDS victims can calm down now.

[CountValentine]

It’s 4 days later and I still don’t see any war.

Are you really that naïve?

Probably just a training exercise. 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/us-deploys-6-b-52-bombers-to-diego-garcia-in-indian-ocean-after-soleimani-strike/ar-BBYG1ij?ocid=spartanntp

[CountValentine]

I guess some are so short sighted they forget how long 911 took to plan. Lets all pound our chest and claim no attack has happened so far so we are right. For those individuals please see my signature.

Or better yet use that same logic about the Messiah.   

[Proisrael]

I guess some are so short sighted they forget how long 911 took to plan. Lets all pound our chest and claim no attack has happened so far so we are right. For those individuals please see my signature.

Or better yet use that same logic about the Messiah.   

You have yet to answer me regarding Hitler.

[CountValentine]

You have yet to answer me regarding Hitler.

If you need to bring him into this discussion you have no argument.

[aygart]

This is your problem. You can't understand anything but the way you see it. Any reasonable person might not agree but at least they understand. You and most here can not look at this objectively.

How is this congruent with this?

To a lesser extent does this make our allies safer, especially Israel?

[CountValentine]

How is this congruent with this?

What's the issue? Israel is one of our allies and this directly affects them.

[aygart]

What's the issue? Israel is one of our allies and this directly affects them.

If it affects them negatively then why would support of Israel cause someone to be unobjective to support this?

[CountValentine]

If it affects them negatively then why would support of Israel cause someone to be unobjective to support this?

Wait for Friday. 

[aygart]

Wait for Friday. 

If it needs to wait for Friday then it most likely shows that it is wrong and simply an unobjective conclusion.

[CountValentine]

If it needs to wait for Friday then it most likely shows that it is wrong and simply an unobjective conclusion.

What it shows is you not being honest in this discussion. It is extremely hard for individuals to be objective when it hits so close to home. I fully understand that, how about you?

[aygart]

What it shows is you not being honest in this discussion. It is extremely hard for individuals to be objective when it hits so close to home. I fully understand that, how about you?

You know that I regularly say that nobody is objective.

[CountValentine]

You know that I regularly say that nobody is objective.

That is your problem not mine. Try getting out more. 
You know that I said before you would make a terrible juror.

[yuneeq]

That is your problem not mine. Try getting out more. 

That must be why anyone can predict just about every opinion of yours.

[yitzgar]

Do you understand why most of the world and probably at least half of the US thinks this was the wrong thing to do?

While I am sure there are some, and perhaps even many that genuinely think so,  (which is fair), you must admit that a great percentage of those against, are against just because it was DJT. I won't even get into the rest of the world.

[CountValentine]

That must be why anyone can predict just about every opinion of yours.

You mean how I could predict 99% of the members response here? Or how I could predict 99% of the members response to pardoning someone? Probably all lucky guesses on my part. You want 5, 10 or more examples?

[CountValentine]

While I am sure there are some, and perhaps even many that genuinely think so,  (which is fair), you must admit that a great percentage of those against, are against just because it was DJT. I won't even get into the rest of the world.

Of course some of it is because they hate Trump. Do you admit that some only support this because they support Trump?

[aygart]

Of course some of it is because they hate Trump. Do you admit that some only support this because they support Trump?

I most definitely do. I would place that as the root cause of the support of many here.

[CountValentine]

I most definitely do. I would place that as the root cause of the support of many here.

So if a D president took this same action many here would not support it? 

[yitzgar]

While I am sure there are some, and perhaps even many that genuinely think so,  (which is fair), you must admit that a great percentage of those against, are against just because it was DJT. I won't even get into the rest of the world.

In addition, not to justify, but a big part of the reason many close their eyes and ears to potential arguments, is specifically because of the knee jerk reaction of the other side. (I imagine this happens both ways). However, there are many who see both sides, but support DJT's actions in this situation, and it doesn't mean they are biased because of Israel. In addition, many may not have given the green light if it was up to them, but now that it is done, are at least happy that he is gone, albeit somewhat apprehensive about possible repercussions.