Iran's Top Terrorist Taken Out By The U.S.

[aygart]

We have heard the current POTUS doesn't even read briefings. Also past presidents were not compulsive liars and ego maniacs like this one. How many past presidents claimed they knew more about everything that the experts?

You probably never watched the apprentice but you should. He making decisions the same way he did on that show. He believes he knows better than anyone else. Very dangerous to have someone in charge like that.

So basically this all comes down to your previous opinions about Trump. Exactly what many here have been saying.

[CountValentine]

So basically this all comes down to your previous opinions about Trump. Exactly what many here have been saying.

1 - I believe this puts America at more risk no matter who made the decision.
2 - I don't trust Trump to make decisions in the best interest of the country and believe he is bad for the our country.
3 - Like many here you can't separate the two. You would never make an impartial juror.

[aygart]

1 - I believe this puts America at more risk no matter who made the decision.
2 - I don't trust Trump to make decisions in the best interest of the country and believe he is bad for the our country.
3 - Like many here you can't separate the two. You would never make an impartial juror.

I don't see how you would know #1 without current inside information.

[CountValentine]

I don't see how you would know #1 without current inside information.

You didn't really just say that, did you? I could have a field day with this but won't. 

[aygart]

Seriously?


They can launch deadly cyber attacks against US soil 

https://time.com/4270728/iran-cyber-attack-dam-fbi/
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/iran-cyber-attack-billionaire-adelson-170413240.html?

[aygart]

You didn't really just say that, did you? I could have a field day with this but won't. 

You are right. I didn't write that well. There is no way of knowing the risk/reward comparison without current inside information.

[CountValentine]

You are right. I didn't write that well. There is no way of knowing the risk/reward comparison without current inside information.

Thank you as we all believe certain things based on the info we have. Somethings we believe are out of this world. 

[chinagel]

Still believe Kap's a good guy?
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/colin-kaepernick-attacks-us-imperialism-154109880.html

[CountValentine]

Still believe Kap's a good guy?
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/colin-kaepernick-attacks-us-imperialism-154109880.html

Who said he was a good guy? Do you understand what he is saying.

[yelped]

Who said he was a good guy? Do you understand what he is saying.

He (Kap) definitely doesn't.

[whYME]

Now me on the other hand who bets on mostly anything would not touch this one. 

Probably because deep down you know we're right but your TDS won't accept it

[whYME]

So if a D president took this same action many here would not support it? 

In general I would agree that's often a problem, I don't think this is one of those cases.

[CountValentine]

Probably because deep down you know we're right but your TDS won't accept it

KISS. You don't bet when it involves American lives.

[aygart]

KISS. You don't bet when it involves American lives.

I thought it was because you don't have enough information?

[whYME]

We are still left with the question, why now?

Him attacking a US embassy last week might have a little something to do with it.

(Side note, but I have a theory that the Ds won't acknowledge this aspect of it because it shows how badly Obama F'ed up Benghazi)

[CountValentine]

He (Kap) definitely doesn't.

I will take that as a no. There is part of the problem.

[CountValentine]

Him attacking a US embassy last week might have a little something to do with it.

Then say that but they he said imminent attacks. We have yet to see a shred on evidence about that.

[aygart]

Then say that but they he said imminent attacks. We have yet to see a shred on evidence about that.

And if we did we would hear all of the complaints about how it is endangering intelligence sources.

[CountValentine]

And if we did we would hear all of the complaints about how it is endangering intelligence sources.

I agree but that has not stopped Trump from disclosing classified information before. Even the so-called briefing they gave congress there is no evidence. Pompeo when asked if it was days or weeks would not answer. DOD states it was to deter future attacks.

[aygart]

I agree but that has not stopped Trump from disclosing classified information before. Even the so-called briefing they gave congress there is no evidence. Pompeo when asked if it was days or weeks would not answer. DOD states it was to deter future attacks.

There is no question that the administration's messaging has been very convoluted to put it mildly.