All Halocha Shailos and Tiffeh Questions

[aygart]

This probably applies

Or he may say it is a mitzvah

[aygart]

This probably applies

If someone goes around trashing divrei chazal such as saying that "the attitude that a menstruatind woman is too dirty to sit next to is not for our time" we should shout from the rooftops that he is to be ignored and expose his attitude problem at every opportunity.

[David Smith]

If someone goes around trashing divrei chazal such as saying that "the attitude that a menstruatind woman is too dirty to sit next to is not for our time" we should shout from the rooftops that he is to be ignored and expose his attitude problem at every opportunity.

There's probably no איסור לשון הרע for a more basic reason than that.

[emjee]

Would I be oiver if I linked it ?

If you hold its assur then yes

I can't pasken until you link

I think it's pretty obvious.  Just open your eyes on the threads

[avromie7]

If someone goes around trashing divrei chazal such as saying that "the attitude that a menstruatind woman is too dirty to sit next to is not for our time" we should shout from the rooftops that he is to be ignored and expose his attitude problem at every opportunity.

Link?

[username]

Link?

You gotta get oit more.

[good sam]

Does this have to be toiveled?

[churnbabychurn]

Does this have to be toiveled?

Nah.. it's part of the house.

But don't rely on me

[emjee]

I'd disagree on that logic.  However , at the same time I don't think that it has a din kli.

[David Smith]

It's just a conduit; it's never used to hold prepared food.

[aygart]

I'd disagree on that logic.  However , at the same time I don't think that it has a din kli.

why and why

[emjee]

#1)why and  #2) why

#1) because it is a separate piece. It's not part of the faucet itself. It's function is different . A person can ADD a filter or not ADD one .

#2) It's just a conduit; it's never used to hold prepared food.

[aygart]

#1) because it is a separate piece. It's not part of the faucet itself. It's function is different . A person can ADD a filter or not ADD one .

1. That doesn't mean it is not attached
2. There are many items which are only a conduit which need tevila

[churnbabychurn]

I'd disagree on that logic.  However , at the same time I don't think that it has a din kli.

What do you min a din kli?
If you mean it's not a kli that is mekabel tumah, that is correct! It is not mekabel tumah because it is mechubar lakarka.

Now there is a major discussion about how much of an affect this factors on hilchas TV"k. But the consensus seems to be that it does have a very large affect.

It's just a conduit; it's never used to hold prepared food.

-.5
Though there can be considerable discussion about whether or not this is classified as a kli seudah, or a kli used to improve in the preparation of food.
Arguably it is neither.

why and why

#1) because it is a separate piece. It's not part of the faucet itself. It's function is different . A person can ADD a filter or not ADD one .

-.1
 It is an item created for the purpose of a fixing it permanently to the structure.

(This is not comparable to a kli that is merely attached with screws, which is not necessarily classified as mechubar for this purpose)

1. That doesn't mean it is not attached
2. There are many items which are only a conduit which need tevila

The widespread accepted minhag is not to toivel these items. For the aforementioned reasons.

[emjee]

What do you min a din kli?
The widespread accepted minhag is not to toivel these items. For the aforementioned reasons.

Thanks rabbi . But then Whyd you say

Nah.. it's part of the house.

But don't rely on me

[churnbabychurn]

Thanks rabbi . But then Whyd you say

Cuz I'm not nearly a Rabbi!

I just pointed out some of the reasons why it wouldn't be necessary...

[emjee]

Does this have to be toiveled?

The widespread accepted minhag is not to toivel these items. For the aforementioned reasons.

Cuz I'm not nearly a Rabbi!

Thanks rabbi !

[myi]

Found very interesting! 

Q. One of the reasons that we cover the Shabbos challos is to remember the mon (manna) which was surrounded on the top and bottom with a layer of dew. The Bi’ur Halachah (Siman 242) asks, why do we make a remembrance for the mon on Shabbos when the mon did not fall on Shabbos?
A. Tosfos (Pesachim 100b) writes that the purpose of covering the challah is to remind us of the mon, and when we remember the mon, we are reminded that the mon did not fall on Shabbos. (Some explanation is needed why we wish to recall the absence of mon on Shabbos. Possibly, it helps us appreciate the elevated level of kedusha on Shabbos, that even the heavenly mon was suspended on Shabbos.)

The Bi’ur Halachah offers another reason to remember the mon, even though it did not fall on Shabbos. He explains that since Shabbos is a semblance of the world to come, the foods that we prepare for Shabbos are meant to remind us of the “meal” that Hashem will prepare for tzadikim in the world to come. We eat fish to correspond to the Leviathan (some type of large fish), meat to correspond to the Shor Habar—the “wild ox” (both are foods of the messianic meal), and challos are covered like mon to correspond to the mon that will be served to tzadikim in the world to come.

[emjee]

Nice !

[churnbabychurn]

Does this need tevila? It is a kli seuda made for decoration only, but it is also functional.

Used to insert half pound dip plastic containers in..