All Halocha Shailos and Tiffeh Questions

[aygart]

if its that

If it is a machlokes? My opinion is that it is. Lmaase I would consider it nbn derech bishul.

[chinagel]

if i can eat it with milchig after

[aygart]

if i can eat it with milchig after

Machlokes mechaber RaMA

[chinagel]

Machlokes mechaber RaMA

gotcha, rama=cant?

[aygart]

gotcha, rama=cant?

Correct

[aygart]

The question then becomes the cooker itself. That is on my list of things to research.

[chinagel]

The question then becomes the cooker itself. That is on my list of things to research.

which question?

[moko]

Correct

chavas da'as. N"t bar n"t besha'as bishul is a ta'am rishon.
In my line of work, the shaila is if you can use a steam kettle for milchig and the fleishig and only kasher the kettle and not drain the jacket condensate. Like the chavas da'as the water is real fleishig

[chinagel]

chavas da'as. N"t bar n"t besha'as bishul is a ta'am rishon.
In my line of work, the shaila is if you can use a steam kettle for milchig and the fleishig and only kasher the kettle and not drain the jacket condensate. Like the chavas da'as the water is real fleishig

so lfi him its real fleishig?

[aygart]

chavas da'as. N"t bar n"t besha'as bishul is a ta'am rishon.
In my line of work, the shaila is if you can use a steam kettle for milchig and the fleishig and only kasher the kettle and not drain the jacket condensate. Like the chavas da'as the water is real fleishig

Correct. That was the other opinion in the machlokes.

[aygart]

so lfi him its real fleishig?

Yes

[cholent]

The question then becomes the cooker itself. That is on my list of things to research.

R' Forchheimer told me I can use it for both fish and meat, but not for both meat and dairy

[moko]

A few shaila:
1. A kli of issura bala that rov tashmisho is also yedei bishul and miyut tashmisho is also yedei tigun/machvas. Can you be metzaref the meikilim (rosh) of machvas with the meikilim of rov tashmisho and only require hagalah ? Similar to what we find by Pesach that were metzaref the kula of machvas and the kula of chametz heteira bala.
2. The Ba"ch says that bedieved if you only had linas leila(Rashi) and then kasher, it works. But if you had linas leila and then cooked the food without kashering, the food is assur. (The Bach learns from a diyuk in יו"ד קכ"א. Where the turbo brings down both shitos as opposed to ק"ג where he only brings 24 hrs.) Are we soimech on this lehalacha and what's pshat in the bach?

3. Does the heter of chamimus hatanur that we find in יו"ד קי"ב סעיף י, does it also apply to bishul akum ?

[aygart]

A few shaila:
1. A kli of issura bala that rov tashmisho is also yedei bishul and miyut tashmisho is also yedei tigun/machvas. Can you be metzaref the meikilim (rosh) of machvas with the meikilim of rov tashmisho and only require hagalah ? Similar to what we find by Pesach that were metzaref the kula of machvas and the kula of chametz heteira bala.
2. The Ba"ch says that bedieved if you only had linas leila(Rashi) and then kasher, it works. But if you had linas leila and then cooked the food without kashering, the food is assur. (The Bach learns from a diyuk in יו"ד קכ"א. Where the turbo brings down both shitos as opposed to ק"ג where he only brings 24 hrs.) Are we soimech on this lehalacha and what's pshat in the bach?

3. Does the heter of chamimus hatanur that we find in יו"ד קי"ב סעיף י, does it also apply to bishul akum ?

1. I hear. Need to think about it at a better time.
2. I think pshat is because the only reason you need eino Ben yomo is because of chanan.
3. Yes it does. The gaon calls it a kal vchomer from kisem

[moko]

2. I think pshat is because the only reason you need eino Ben yomo is because of chanan.

but what's the difference if you kashered or not regarding the food. If your being soimech on linas leila to say that what the pot re absorbs is pagum then be soimech on it to say that the food is muttar. And if your not soimech on it to say the food is muttar then also say that what the kli reabsorbs is issur

[aygart]

but what's the difference if you kashered or not regarding the food. If your being soimech on linas leila to say that what the pot re absorbs is pagum then be soimech on it to say that the food is muttar. And if your not soimech on it to say the food is muttar then also say that what the kli reabsorbs is issur

You are being mitztaref the shitos that no chanan by shaar issurim

[DanH]

http://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/48557/sous-vide-cooking-for-shabbat
Article with links to shiur in subject

Newer shiur:
http://www.yutorah.org/lectures/lecture.cfm/868758/rabbi-aryeh-lebowitz/sous-vide-cooking-on-shabbat/

[moko]

You are being mitztaref the shitos that no chanan by shaar issurim

but then the first time you're mavashel lach should be like the hagolo of the Bach. It doesn't seem to be the case

[aygart]

but then the first time you're mavashel lach should be like the hagolo of the Bach. It doesn't seem to be the case

are you referring to TaZ 93.2?

[Cheesecake]

Which poskim say covering the knobs with no blech works?