COVID-19 (Wuhan Novel Coronavirus) Pandemic Master Thread

[neveryou]

https://x.com/kevinnbass/status/1839119878659223995?t=rNNqUgs6iXR8AnL4gXMz-g&s=19


These people need to go to jail.

[Alexsei]

insert-all-xxx-partying-bureaucrats-here

[Alexsei]

California reintroducing COVID mask mandates in 5 Bay Area counties until March/April 2025 in healthcare facilities.

[Alexsei]

https://x.com/wideawake_media/status/1847895753655468504

[yelped]

As we all knew already:

https://x.com/thehoffather/status/1850690864575861204

[Alexsei]

As we all knew already:

https://x.com/thehoffather/status/1850690864575861204

Were they too defying the guidelines?

[yelped]

Were they too defying the guidelines?

No one else was inspected.

[Alexsei]

No one else was inspected.

I get that, but it doesn't answer my question

[aygart]

No one else was inspected.

We're they even open for in person?

[yuneeq]

I get that, but it doesn't answer my question

It does. If you don’t inspect then you won’t find anyone else in violation. Selecting exclusively Jewish schools for inspection means that only Jewish schools could be in violation, which is exactly what the anti-semites were aiming for.

[aygart]

It does. If you don’t inspect then you won’t find anyone else in violation. Selecting exclusively Jewish schools for inspection means that only Jewish schools could be in violation, which is exactly what the anti-semites were aiming for.

We're they even open for in person?

[yuneeq]

We're they even open for in person?

 If they were no one was investigating to find out.

[yuneeq]

If they were no one was investigating to find out.

Furthermore - the OP on X is claiming that many of these places did not receive a citation. If correct, it isn’t even debatable how blatantly antsemitic this was.

[Yehuda57]

It does. If you don’t inspect then you won’t find anyone else in violation. Selecting exclusively Jewish schools for inspection means that only Jewish schools could be in violation, which is exactly what the anti-semites were aiming for.

Exactly. But even then, these reports are not even violations.
https://x.com/thehoffather/status/1850715139265491255

Remember this thread?

https://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?topic=120725.0

That was a drop in the bucket

[Alexsei]

https://x.com/DrJBhattacharya/status/1849703925395697797

[Alexsei]

https://x.com/dockaurG/status/1857198903403389410

[aygart]

It is obvious that the prolonged lockdowns were ridiculous. This is what most of these studies and discussions are about. I would love to see if there is any data about whether the original "2 weeks" of lockdown when we had a lot of people dying from an illness that wasn't understood with some overloaded hospitals made sense. The fears of what could have happened was mostly rational. The issue seems more that there was no real thought put into an exit plan.

Thi accentuates the importance of publicly discussing plans to unwind and not giving vagaries. There are many reasons people can feel that it is safe for them to relax and some of them are legitimate. In order to prevent it from being taken to far communication of a roadmap is needed.

There are many who feel the restrictions went much longer than made sense. At the time I wrote numerous times that even the most precise restrictions require a good exit strategy which nobody had even thought about.

The prolonged restrictions were limited to places where politics led to those restrictions with no clear offramp.

By May 2020 most places had no restrictions, which proved to be the correct time for that to happen.

[Alexsei]

Many people who were directly involved in caring for victims during these first few weeks are of the opinion that the severity of the situation at the time and the number of deaths were directly correlated with the fear instilled upon healthcare workers. So essentially they say that the first two weeks of lockdown were actually responsible for many of these deaths.

But it might have been a catch22, because people were getting sick and many of them would end up needing to be hospitalized so as long as the situation in the hospitals didn't calm down it was imperative to keep as many people as possible out of the hospital.

[AsherO]

Many people who were directly involved in caring for victims during these first few weeks are of the opinion that the severity of the situation at the time and the number of deaths were directly correlated with the fear instilled upon healthcare workers. So essentially they say that the first two weeks of lockdown were actually responsible for many of these deaths.

But it might have been a catch22, because people were getting sick and many of them would end up needing to be hospitalized so as long as the situation in the hospitals didn't calm down it was imperative to keep as many people as possible out of the hospital.

Even if what you’re saying is true, you can’t fault anyone for being afraid considering what was going on.

[etech0]

Hindsight is 2020. Literally.