yeshivas that are open

[ExGingi]

While 770 isn't open (the dining room is currently providing grab and go meals to the bochurim that are here), the bochurim that stayed around are making their own sedorim. I just heard of 3 bochurim that just boarded a flight back here from EY, so I expect quite a few that left to start trickling back.

[Euclid]

This is going to be quite ironic, that the small number of families which aren't going to be attending school are the ones following mainstream medical advice. The anti-vaxxer reversal.

[shwarmabob]

While 770 isn't open (the dining room is currently providing grab and go meals to the bochurim that are here), the bochurim that stayed around are making their own sedorim. I just heard of 3 bochurim that just boarded a flight back here from EY, so I expect quite a few that left to start trickling back.

is 1414 dorm open yet? where are they staying? Are there shiurim? or chavrusas in local shuls? Reb Yoel?

[ExGingi]

is 1414 dorm open yet? where are they staying? Are there shiurim? or chavrusas in local shuls? Reb Yoel?

1414 is closed. 749 is open. Apparently one (or more) of the larger rooms was converted to a בית המדרש. In addition there are apartments.

[ExGingi]

1414 is closed. 749 is open. Apparently one (or more) of the larger rooms was converted to a בית המדרש. In addition there are apartments.

Update:

20 bochurim are allowed in 770

https://anash.org/central-chabad-yeshiva-reopens-with-limited-participants/

[S209]

Your post makes it sound like hospitalizations at least as prevelant in young people as old people. Even if you include people who didn't know in the "healthy" group, they'll still consist of a very small percentage.

My post makes nothing sound like anything. I quoted a statistic, any further dissection of why is theory and speculation. Accusing me of being misleading is disingenuous and wrong. There was nothing misleading about my post.

You are speculating. Perhaps bring hard numbers as I have.

[ExGingi]

Update:

20 bochurim are allowed in 770

https://anash.org/central-chabad-yeshiva-reopens-with-limited-participants/

Constant trickle of Israeli bochurim returning to 770 from EY.

[Joeymc]

Constant trickle of Israeli bochurim returning to 770 from EY.

Is the border open to foreigners with student visas?

[ExGingi]

Is the border open to foreigners with student visas?

They are coming in. I don't know if they are coming under student visas like they originally did, or under tourist visas, but every day a few more arrive.

[Joeymc]

They are coming in. I don't know if they are coming under student visas like they originally did, or under tourist visas, but every day a few more arrive.

But definitely not us passport holders, right?

[PlatinumGuy]

The US has no Corona related restrictions on people traveling from Israel, but Israeli citizens always need a visa to enter the US.

[ExGingi]

But definitely not us passport holders, right?

A few are. But most (or many) are not.

[AsherO]

Update:

20 bochurim are allowed in 770

https://anash.org/central-chabad-yeshiva-reopens-with-limited-participants/

How are they choosing which 20? Who is controlling entry and how? Doesn’t 770 (not 784/788) have it’s own address? Can’t they allow another 10 there? Minyan only the Rebbe’s room?

[avromie7]

My post makes nothing sound like anything. I quoted a statistic, any further dissection of why is theory and speculation. Accusing me of being misleading is disingenuous and wrong. There was nothing misleading about my post.

You are speculating. Perhaps bring hard numbers as I have.

Multiple people misread and misunderstood your post, that's why they responded that it was wrong until you got upset at them that they misunderstood your convoluted post. Yes, it was misleading.

[S209]

Multiple people misread the chart you linked to which said exactly what you posted, which is why one of them subsequently deleted his post and the other (very reluctantly) admitted he was mistaken.

FTFY

[S209]

Multiple people misread and misunderstood your post, that's why they responded that it was wrong until you got upset at them that they misunderstood your convoluted post. Yes, it was misleading.

Cognitive dissonance will only get one so far in life. I posted facts which proved your assertion false. You answered with speculation and accusations.

[S209]

Nobody misread the chart. We misread your post because we didn't imagine that you would create a super-demographic to try to spin the story your way. We thought you were working with the demographics on that website.

The point remains that, that 16% (65+) of the population had over 40% of the hospitalizations.

@yungermanchik You’re lying. You misread the chart and made a stupid mistake, which is why you deleted your post (which everyone can still see where I quoted you). It’s fine to make a mistake, we’re all human. I called you out but you’re not man enough to apologize and admit you were wrong, so you deleted the post and now you’re trying to double down. I was working with exactly the demographics on that website, and that’s exactly what I said.

It’s ok to make mistakes, but the right thing to do now would be to admit you were wrong and move on instead of trying to create new avenues to attack.

[avromie7]

Instead of attacking everyone for misreading your misleading post, you should probably stop while you're not so far behind and admit your post was misleading.

[S209]

Instead of attacking everyone for misreading your misleading post, you should probably stop while you're not so far behind and admit your post was misleading.

As I have shown, one deleted his post and the other admitted he misread the chart. You’ve yet to show how it was misleading. Here’s another chance: Please show what was misleading about my post. Go for it.

[avromie7]

As I have shown, one deleted his post and the other admitted he misread the chart. You’ve yet to show how it was misleading. Here’s another chance: Please show what was misleading about my post. Go for it.

The fact that many people misunderstood is very telling. I'm done with this petty argument.