Total Members Voted: 58
Voting closed: April 17, 2020, 03:42:36 PM
And possible poorly administered tests. It is unlikely for anyone who caught it in camp to be testing positive so quickly.
A COVID-19 case associated with the camp A outbreak was defined as a positive viral SARS-CoV-2 test** in a camp A attendee from a specimen collected or reported to DPH from the first day at camp A (June 17 for staff members and trainees; June 21 for campers) through 14 days after leaving camp A (trainees left on June 21; staff members and campers left during June 24–June 27)
I don't s see how so many could have caught it and tested positive in4days
The report just says that the (positive) tests were given within 14 days after camp ended (June 27).
I don’t see where it says they all got tested within 4 days. They caught it during that 4 day period, and tested positive later on.
We're a full month in. No real spread in the zillions of camps and day camps that are open. Gives way more credence to the herd immunity in the frum community in NYNJ argument.
I know of one large camp that set up in PA, had a bunch of kids sick, and refused to do a single test. I highly doubt they are the only ones.
Out of town kids brought it in... there's also a camp in the Catskills that has alot of kids from miami and had a huge outbreak.
But how did that cause am outbreak if they are immune?
The outbreak was the out of town kids....
I don't get it...
If instead of panicking and sending the kids home to their vulnerable communities, they would just let them wait out their asymptomatic situation until camp was over, they would have a buffer instead of a spreader.
If the camps would shut down would they be required to return money?
.
Exclusively? How much of the camp was out of town?
The one in NY definitely did not shut down.
No local kids got sick?