And that would be?
No idea. Why would anyone asking valid questions
Were you practicing strict social distancing until now? Did you or your spouse travel outside of Lakewood within the past few weeks?
Did you test for the flu or strep? I and many others had symptoms 2+ months ago but still got a positive result 2 months later. It's possible you got the virus a while back and now you're sick with something else. What are your symptoms?
be relegated to
I see pre-Purim denial mode is back in full force once again.
Sure there are those who were in denial before purim and there will be those in denial if there is a second wave. But valid questions are not something that should be lumped together with them. We ought to focus carefully on the data and the more detailed the data points are the more useful that data is.
I think it’s fair to expect some spread with any reopening since a significant amount of people did shelter in place. If and when we do see an uptick in cases it is important to get a good picture. What is the demographic? Is it widespread? Is it leading to significant hospitalizations or ch”v increased mortality? Or is it something to be taken in context as the price of reopening?
And I must say, along with the covid deniers there are extremes on the other side too. I’ve heard people say even one Jewish death is too much and we must keep everything on lockdown unless we can be sure that will not happen.
That is simply not a way to live life. If we looked at every summer season with the tragedies that happen in the water and on the roads, if we looked at every mass event like the siyum hashas and worried over injuries and people getting sick in the cold etc we would be paralyzed with indecision. There is a certain acceptable amount of risk and it has to be proportional. There one acceptable level of risk for a camp wilderness trek. There’s a different level of acceptable risk for opening shuls and yeshivos and living normal communal Jewish life.
I don’t think there’s a consensus of what that level is but it ought to be within a range. And the only way to get a sense of that risk is to get good data. If a second wave comes and is indeed severe (I do not expect to see this) I want to be able to see this in the data so I can be one of the first to take precautions as I did purim time. And if it looks manageable as it does at this point (I do think a number of people getting sick and recovering is an acceptable risk) I want to look at every new data point to see if there are any indications that a close eye should be kept on the situation.
Is it possible we miss the start of a new wave and are caught flatfooted like before purim? Sure. Life is full of risks. As long as our best guess is that that is not the case and the risk is proportional that is the way to go, within reason.