What does the first sentence have to with it unless you are now saying he had immediate knowledge of a crime being committed. Is that what you are saying?
I'm saying that what he did was not necessarily illegal.
If you go back and read the posts I wrote, you'll see that I say and continue to say.
1. They possibly had immediate knowledge of a misdemeanor crime of trespassing.
2. It's possible they had knowledge of felony crimes he allegedly committed. There are reports that more then one robbery occurred in the area and some were not reported to the police.
3. Even if the above two dont apply, it's not necessarily that trying to stop someone becomes illegal.
It's fair to say you dont like Georgia law, regarding citizens arrest, gun open carry and stand your ground.... These are the laws currently in place. A person can only be expected to follow what's written.
There can usually be a way to interpret and bend laws the way one likes, hence why the police and AG didn't initially press charges. Laws are sometimes applied unequally.
This doesn't mean that every person not getting charged for a crime is given a pass and every person charged should be charged. In this case based on the current available facts, there are laws to back up the claim not to charge these guys. A reasonable prosecutor can come to the same conclusion based on available facts. You can read the police report and letters from the prosecution. An average person with no LE background might've gotten charged and might've not.
The local DA doing the initial investigation at first recommended no charges but then recused themselves due to prior relationship and they referred the case to the neighboring county DA that recommend this case be bought in front of a grand jury. The GJ proceedings were delayed due to COVID. During this time these guys didn't run or bail. They stayed put in their home. When media got hold of this story they turned it into a racial based story saying there is no justice when in fact it was going to go in front of a GJ. The media claims promted outcry from infamous El Sharpton.
While some would take issue with the fact that they were even going to bring this to a GJ, put that aside, they were going to go in front of a GJ, a typical procedure. Why when media tries pushing a narrative the prosecutors feel compelled to immediately arrest. They are scared of being called racist, partial and favorable to LE. It's a very normal thing to let someone on the loose before GJ proceedings.
Everyone can debate the law and how it applies to these ppl and even change strategy when statute's are read correctly. I just fail to see based on evidence how him being black contributed to his death. If it's a feeling, then I get you, but the facts just dont currently support it. This might change in the future but who knows.
Can you explain why you think this was racially motivated?
Anywaze, some new intrestesting footage is showing up. And based on current available information it seems that
[
This is not ur typical guy wondering into a construction zone.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7N6bC5cnVUhttps://twitter.com/RealCandaceO/status/1260039264525586438There is another side to this story as well, these guys knew Arbur from his past work in LE and knew of his prior legal history.
