Lawsuits Alleging Religious Discrimination - Covid 19

[yesitsme]

Trumps toothless political stunt has nothing to do with it.

https://twitter.com/OneJerseySchorr/status/1265013308807163916

[SwellCindy]

Fixed it

Errr, not quite.

[YitzyS]

Phixxed itt

FTFY

[flyingace]

Fixed it

Oy!

[YitzyS]

Fixed it

I move to impeach @Something Fishy for abuse of power.

[S209]

I move to impeach @Something Fishy for abuse of power.

And..... banned.

[Yehuda57]

This title makes me want to jump off ellej

[KSMH]

https://twitter.com/RonColeman/status/1265378061840789504

NJ case in federal court has a hearing scheduled for the 4th of June.

The TRO, was not granted but instead a expedited hearing date was given.

[CountValentine]

At every level it has been ruled it is not discrimination.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-won-t-force-states-to-speed-up-church-reopenings/ar-BB14ML3j?ocid=spartan-ntp-feeds

[aygart]

At every level it has been ruled it is not discrimination.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-won-t-force-states-to-speed-up-church-reopenings/ar-BB14ML3j?ocid=spartan-ntp-feeds

The reasoning of Roberts makes a lot of sense. Expect this to be back in front of them now that some types of assembly are being opened in some states.

[CountValentine]

The reasoning of Roberts makes a lot of sense. Expect this to be back in front of them now that some types of assembly are being opened in some states.

They need to treat religious gatherings the same as every other non-essential business. Seems pretty simple.

[aygart]

They need to treat religious gatherings the same as every other non-essential business. Seems pretty simple.

Not business but assembly. If it was business them they need to be allowed similar to other non essential business which are allowed.

[gozalim]

They need to treat religious gatherings the same as every other non-essential business. Seems pretty simple.

the state does not get to entangle in whether my worship is essential, they do get to apply lockdowns based on inherent danger (i.e. assembly vs. passing business)

[CountValentine]

the state does not get to entangle in whether my worship is essential, they do get to apply lockdowns based on inherent danger (i.e. assembly vs. passing business)

When comes to health issues they do get to say if it is essential or not.

[yesitsme]

When comes to health issues they do get to say if it is essential or not.

False!
proof?
go look in all shuls whats going on and you tell me if it essential or not

essential is not a decision process
if I tell you its not essential for you to use the john what do you think its going to happen?

[CountValentine]

False!
proof?

Look at the court rulings.

[aygart]

When comes to health issues they do get to say if it is essential or not.

That was not in the SCOTUS ruling. In fact from the opinions of the court it seems that they ruled unanimously otherwise. The majority opinion stated this.

the state does not get to entangle in whether my worship is essential, they do get to apply lockdowns based on inherent danger (i.e. assembly vs. passing business)

The dissenting opinion was that even this was not constitutional.

[aygart]

Look at the court rulings.

The SCOTUS ruling was exactly the opposite of what you are saying.

[CountValentine]

The SCOTUS ruling was exactly the opposite of what you are saying.

You sure about that? Didn't Roberts equate churches with concert halls, movie theaters, sporting arenas, theaters and the like?

[aygart]

You sure about that? Didn't Roberts equate churches with concert halls, movie theaters, sporting arenas, theaters and the like?

He did based on type of use.

(i.e. assembly vs. passing business)