This isn't about banning one person's YouTube video.
When a problem is introduced like this:
YouTube, acting under the false pretense of protecting its users from so-called “hate speech,” has begun to remove videos that communicate Jewish values.
and ends with the following solution:
We respectfully request that they be once again made accessible for the world to see, hear and be inspired by.
then I believe a reasonable person could understand this to mean that this is about one person's YouTube videos having been removed, and the request for them to be reinstated. Perhaps the petition could be re-written to focus on whatever this
is about.
Censoring Jews from publicizing words of Torah is an insensitive act
This is about living in a world where mainstream (and until 5 minutes ago non-controversial) Jewish beliefs are labeled "hate speech" and people who should know better shrugging their shoulders.
In my world, I haven't seen Jewish beliefs labeled "hate speech." Last time I looked in a Sefer Torah, no words of the Torah had been blacked out by the censor. Last time I entered a sforim store, there were no labels condemning the writing as "hate speech". Your claim that Jewish beliefs are labeled "hate speech" seems greatly exaggerated, and seems to apply to this one video. Since the video is apparently no longer viewable, we can't judge whether or not it can be construed as hate speech.
The petition suggests that YouTube has removed a video which it felt was hate speech. YouTube's policy includes this: "If your content violates this policy, we’ll remove the content and send you an email to let you know. If this is your first time violating our Community Guidelines, you’ll likely get a warning with no penalty to your channel. If it’s not, we may issue a strike against your channel. If you get 3 strikes within 90 days, your channel will be terminated."
In searching YouTube, I see a channel called Maor, which has 2,482 videos. Does it really seem worthwhile to jeopardize the good work that channel is doing by insisting that it include this one?