Even without reading it as 100% it is ridiculous.
I'm not understanding why this conversation took this turn....There was fraud this year. There is fraud every year. Maybe a little more this year than usual, given the circumstances. But don't pretend it only happened on one side and not the other.
Except we have thousands of pots and only one kettle. Blinders, blinders, blinders.
Unless you're on that Jewish kick again, you know this is wrong. Your views are not one-of-a-kind.
Unless you're on that Jewish kick again,
Since you brought this up lets give it a try with your logic.I am 100% sure members here attack me because I am not Jewish.Is this a fair statement?
Yes.
Doesn't that create problems if a leader said: I am 100% sure Jews are not following the guidelines.If you take that to mean some it is accurate but no way in H*LL is that fair statement to make. You understand my point?
Context is everything. A leader singling out Jews is a problem.
I happen to agree with @CountValentine here, but take it easy. No point arguing about what he wrote after he clarified his position.
Just a side note. Does everyone understand if you get two ballots and send them both in only one is going to be counted?
I got ballots in 2 states, others get ballots for dead people, etc.
AP dead or Obi dead?
Most of these instances are ballots that are issued to two different people, yourself and a previous resident, who either died or possibly moved out of state.
How about a national voter roll?
Sounds good and should be matched against death certs.
It would only help for some, and should be done. It won't help for the person who didn't vote in their new location, like California.
