Is the WSJ to the right of FOX?

[CountValentine]

What say you?

[Lurker]

What say you?

They're definitely right more often than FOX.

[CountValentine]

They're definitely right more often than FOX.

Not the question and that is not saying much.

[Mo2]

What say you?

I say their journalist and journal overall are most definitely not.
However, their opinion section is conservative.

[CountValentine]

I say their journalist and journal overall are most definitely not.
However, their opinion section is conservative.

An actual answer to a question. TY!

[justaregularguy]

no

that was fun. lock thread.

[CountValentine]

no

that was fun. lock thread.

No need to lock the thread. One of the few we don't have religion so far.
We might even get another thought out response.

[Mikes@Micro]

What say you?

Business focused outlets tend to report closer to straight facts, less bias spin as that is what their readership is looking for.

Other outlets need a different draw to convince you to read them (hence more of an agenda) whether it's a sports publication pushing you to have a strong affinity towards one team and "hate" another or invite you over some political issue or even a tabloid drawing you in with whatever.

Yeshivos only allow clean reading material (obviously?) There is a large established Yeshiva which only allows WSJ (+religious publications) as they determined it to be the cleanest.

Short read: Whatever the political leanings of the WSJ, they have the most straight reporting.

[justaregularguy]

Business focused outlets tend to report closer to straight facts, less bias spin as that is what their readership is looking for.

Other outlets need a different draw to convince you to read them (hence more of an agenda) whether it's a sports publication pushing you to have a strong affinity towards one team and "hate" another or invite you over some political issue or even a tabloid drawing you in with whatever.

Yeshivos only allow clean reading material (obviously?) There is a large established Yeshiva which only allows WSJ (+religious publications) as they determined it to be the cleanest.

Short read: Whatever the political leanings of the WSJ, they have the most straight reporting.

maybe a better question would then be is WSJ more to the right of FOX business channel?

[CountValentine]

maybe a better question would then be is WSJ more to the right of FOX business channel?

Fox business channel I would not put in the reporting closer to straight facts category.

[CountValentine]

We might even get another thought out response.

Bingo!

Business focused outlets tend to report closer to straight facts, less bias spin as that is what their readership is looking for.

Other outlets need a different draw to convince you to read them (hence more of an agenda) whether it's a sports publication pushing you to have a strong affinity towards one team and "hate" another or invite you over some political issue or even a tabloid drawing you in with whatever.

Yeshivos only allow clean reading material (obviously?) There is a large established Yeshiva which only allows WSJ (+religious publications) as they determined it to be the cleanest.

Short read: Whatever the political leanings of the WSJ, they have the most straight reporting.

[Mikes@Micro]

maybe a better question would then be is WSJ more to the right of FOX business channel?

Fox business channel I would not put in the reporting closer to straight facts category.

By definition tv/ radio is less facts more story vs print7. I believe @CountValentine has a take on this. I have what to say but I'm happy to defer to the expert.

[CountValentine]

By definition tv/ radio is less facts more story vs print7. I believe @CountValentine has a take on this. I have what to say but I'm happy to defer to the expert.

Go right ahead. What I say means nothing to the Kool-Aid drinkers.
They think I am a left wing liberal. 

[Jellybelly]

Business focused outlets tend to report closer to straight facts, less bias spin as that is what their readership is looking for.

Other outlets need a different draw to convince you to read them (hence more of an agenda) whether it's a sports publication pushing you to have a strong affinity towards one team and "hate" another or invite you over some political issue or even a tabloid drawing you in with whatever.

Yeshivos only allow clean reading material (obviously?) There is a large established Yeshiva which only allows WSJ (+religious publications) as they determined it to be the cleanest.

Short read: Whatever the political leanings of the WSJ, they have the most straight reporting.

So to sum it up, if your trying to stick to facts, you’re automatically gonna lean more to the right than Fox. That’s something I can agree with

[CountValentine]

So to sum it up, if your trying to stick to facts, you’re automatically gonna lean more to the right than Fox. That’s something I can agree with

So the farther to the right you lean the closer you are to the facts? Going to assume you didn't mean that.

[Jellybelly]

So the farther to the right you lean the closer you are to the facts? Going to assume you didn't mean that.

Right, did say that and didn’t mean that

[CountValentine]

Right, did say that and didn’t mean that

So you move to the left of the right and move to the right of the left to get the facts. That puts you in the middle also known as an I. 

[CountValentine]

Kimberley Strassel belongs on FOX with Hannity.

[Lurker]

https://www.foxnews.com/media/wsj-editorial-board-cancel-culture-criticism

https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-note-to-readers-11595547898

[CountValentine]

https://www.foxnews.com/media/wsj-editorial-board-cancel-culture-criticism

https://www.wsj.com/articles/a-note-to-readers-11595547898

They should have left out "fairly and down the middle" and it would have been accurate.

Most Journal reporters attempt to cover the news fairly and down the middle, and our opinion pages offer an alternative to the uniform progressive views that dominate nearly all of today’s media," the note stated.