This was probably the first post to give me that impression.
I didn't mean that schools should've remained closed; I think the benefit::risk ratio is worth keeping them open (see my previous posts on this topic). But
I feel that for
the first school which took that risk, and took the responsibility for their extremely high risk employee, to market said employee for a fundraising campaign is distasteful. It feels like, for the school, that money trumps all (which is why I compared it to the apparent need for schools to keep their weddings halls opened with no restrictions.)
Again, this is my stupid opinion and it's clear that the family is fully on board so I don't really want to discuss it more.