Everyone who tests is asked for identifying information, wouldn't that information be used to identify where the positives are coming from?
In the beginning I heard conflicting information about whether or not duplicated are removed with the reports of duplicates being counted twice being more reliable. I haven't heard anyone confirm that they really are removed.
The system in these states record the positives with all of your info. So when they log your info and see that you had a previous positive then they won’t count this as a new positive.
I believe people reported as recently as this week that all they were asked for (in NJ) was name & telephone number.
True, but why wouldn’t they affect the positivity rate regardless of how close together they are?
If someone was exposed on 9/1 and get tested as a precaution on 9/7, they they are exposed again on 10/1 and get tested as a precaution on 10/7. Either way we tested a possible COVID exposed person, they fact that it was the same person both times makes no difference.
But you are making this up, not basing it off of any information you’ve seen. I have no trouble assuming each person is counted as one case.
The story mentioned by OP taught us a grand total of 0 new information.
Source? You have an awful lot of confidence in a government that has showed us time and again that it's completely incompetent.