Do you mean this conversation?
Yes.
That's the conversation in which you claim that I called Trump a facist.
You define this - "Trump is a very very light Fascist. He's more of a Fascist wannabe" as me calling him a fascist.
The argument about if Trump is Fascist is based on how you interpret his rhetoric and tweets (and many of his actions too, for example with how he demands loyalty from his AGs, which you can say that Comey's a liar) and the argument goes on and on and on.
But I honestly feel that if you don't know at all to what I'm referring to that would cause me to think Trump is a "very very light Fascist. He's more of a Fascist wannabe", then I'm wasting my time. You're just not intellectually honest. Admit you know the "facts" and give me your theory why I'm interpreting it wrong. Don't gaslight me to give you the facts. You know exactly what Trump has done that would make me think that. That's my point. Don't play fake ignorance.
Also, maybe you should try reading what people write before you respond. You remembered it as me calling Trump a fascist, which was exactly the opposite of what I was saying.