Celebrate the death of those you feel deserve to die.

[Yehuda57]

You might to explain that to your fellow members.
https://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?topic=115106.720

Did you feel the same for Osama? My guess is you feel like Saeb Erakat is just someone on a different side with political differences. He's not. He was a leading member of a terrorist organization with the blood of thousands, including innocent babies, on his hands.

[CountValentine]

Did you feel the same for Osama? My guess is you feel like Saeb Erakat is just someone on a different side with political differences. He's not. He was a leading member of a terrorist organization with the blood of thousands, including innocent babies, on his hands.

You missed the point. That thread was the wrong place for it.

[Yehuda57]

You missed the point. That thread was the wrong place for it.

A) There have been discussions in that thread. Some eventually were split off into their own threads.
B) Discussions always break out on this forum, in threads that have "no discussion" in the title.
c) That's not what you said to Lurker, you intimated that you thought less of him because of his views. (And yes, I know you will spin "completing the picture" not to mean that, but any amount of honesty would preclude such spin.)

[aygart]

A) There have been discussions in that thread. Some eventually were split off into their own threads.
B) Discussions always break out on this forum, in threads that have "no discussion" in the title.
c) That's not what you said to Lurker, you intimated that you thought less of him because of his views. (And yes, I know you will spin "completing the picture" not to mean that, but any amount of honesty would preclude such spin.)

Come on, man! This is JS.

[CountValentine]

A) There have been discussions in that thread. Some eventually were split off into their own threads.
B) Discussions always break out on this forum, in threads that have "no discussion" in the title.
c) That's not what you said to Lurker, you intimated that you thought less of him because of his views. (And yes, I know you will spin "completing the picture" not to mean that, but any amount of honesty would preclude such spin.)

You would think even with all our disagreements we could agree not to sh*t in certain threads. I guess not. 

[Yehuda57]

You would think even with all our disagreements we could agree not to sh*t in certain threads. I guess not.

That is one change I thought I would never have to make to your picture.

[TimT]

Sorry, thought today was Friday.

#Dadoftriplets

[CountValentine]

I would like to thank everyone for stopping to pollute the other thread.

[coffeebean]

...

This sounds selfish

[Lurker]

I would like to thank everyone for stopping to pollute the other thread.

I agree with you that a thread devoted to the memories of lives lost shouldn't get polluted with garbage. It also shouldn't be tainted by death announcements of terrorists. That said, your reaction to a thread going off topic was a bit over the top, and your wording strongly insinuated that you had more of an issue with the death being celebrated than the OT thread.

[CountValentine]

I agree with you that a thread devoted to the memories of lives lost shouldn't get polluted with garbage. It also shouldn't be tainted by death announcements of terrorists. That said, your reaction to a thread going off topic was a bit over the top, and your wording strongly insinuated that you had more of an issue with the death being celebrated than the OT thread.

I insinuated no such thing but am accustomed to being accused of things that are not true. Putting him in that thread was an insult to everyone in that thread.
More than once I did the same thing for this thread: https://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?topic=52516.0
We call each other whatever we want or lose respect for each other. We should be able to agree some threads are off limits.

[Yehuda57]

I insinuated no such thing

That is one change I thought I would never have to make to your picture.

You might to explain that to your fellow members.
https://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?topic=115106.720

[CountValentine]

You have one picture in your head and it seems that is not going to change.

[Yehuda57]

You have one picture in your head and it seems that is not going to change.

I'm literally quoting your posts without commentary.

[CountValentine]

I'm literally quoting your posts without commentary.

...and you are going to read them the way you want.

You have one picture in your head and it seems that is not going to change.

[Lurker]

...and you are going to read them the way you want.

Rereading your posts, I understand what you were trying to say. But please understand something: nobody read it the way you intended. If everyone is misinterpreting what you're trying to say, including people you generally respect for their command of the English language, maybe you need to find a better way of communicating your point.

[CountValentine]

Rereading your posts, I understand what you were trying to say. But please understand something: nobody read it the way you intended.

It seems everyone understood my intent. There as been ZERO posts in that thread since I made my posts.

Maybe start another thread for this instead of trashing this one.

How about we keep a serious thread OT. Is that to much to ask?

In this thread, NO!!!

Here you go: https://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?topic=121138.new#new

You would think all of us have some common sense but I guess that is not the case.

[Lurker]

It seems everyone understood my intent. There as been ZERO posts in that thread since I made my posts.

So when I/they say I/they thought you meant something else, everyone's just lying to you? Why is everyone driving the wrong way?

[CountValentine]

So when I/they say I/they thought you meant something else, everyone's just lying to you? Why is everyone driving the wrong way?

All I know is what happened and there are no more posts in that thread. If someone doesn't understand my intent from those five posts above they have an issue.

I can post my theory but I don't think it is necessary.   

[Yehuda57]

All I know is what happened and there are no more posts in that thread. If someone doesn't understand my intent from those five posts above they have an issue.

I can post my theory but I don't think it is necessary.   

You conveniently ignored the posts I quoted, including my original post in *this* thread which responded to your post which had absolutely nothing to do with clogging another thread.