I get that you think there’s something wrong with your post but I don’t.
Figures.
I’m not looking to stand on anyone’s grave. This specific fellow completely disregarded any social distancing measures, as anyone could find with a little digging. That’s what the tweet was about (which, again, I completely disavow). As a congressman and leader it’s ones job to try to effect change smartly and not fall for the all-or-nothing narrative, thus directly causing deaths, sometimes one’s own.
There should be a middle ground. Large crowded indoor rallies and parties with no masks or SD during a massive local outbreak is not that. And finally: just because you don’t believe in COVID doesn’t mean COVID can’t get you.
IOW, no offense, but ....
"I'm not looking to stand on anyone's grave, but don't mind me while I stomp, or actually, *I* won't stomp, I'll just share a tweet of someone who did. But no, I don't agree with that person, but it's still post-worthy, I mean, it's not right that they're stomping, but the stomping is valid..."
Does anyone here disagree, though?
Everyone's idea of a middle ground tends to be "the opinion that matches mine to a tee".
It's on both sides, but the inability to reassess, reanalyze and admit when priors get disproven coupled with the inability to empathize and recognize that restrictions or lack thereof affect every individual differently and can have catastrophic consequences is destroying us.
If a high-profile hardened lockdown supporter had a child commit suicide, and someone quote-tweeted one of their tweets reasonably suggesting extreme social distancing to announce the death, you would not be discussing the irony of said post.
