Twitter bans sitting President

[CountValentine]

What’s a true Republican?
🙄

You will know it when you see it (I hope).
I can tell what isn't is replacing someone who votes overwhelmingly for R issues with someone who is barely over 50%. That is trying to silence her for speaking the truth that the election wasn't stolen.

[zh cohen]

You can all debate that.

So you are not going to answer my simple yes or no question. Noted

The election wasn't stolen and proven to be not stolen with all the recounts.

Only if you are using an extremely narrow definition of "stolen".

Saying it was stolen undermines our democracy.

Significantly less so than changing the rules in the middle of the election to benefit one side does.

[Toasted]

You can all debate that.
The election wasn't stolen and proven to be not stolen with all the recounts. Saying it was stolen undermines our democracy.

Funny to hear this from the folks who labeled 2016 stolen because the Russians bought 150k worth of Facebook ads.

Then it was called SPEAK TRUTH TO POWER. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW. FOLLOW THE FACTS. Let's get 30 polarized prosecutors to dig for a crime

[CountValentine]

Funny to hear this from the folks who labeled 2016 stolen because the Russians bought 150k worth of Facebook ads.

That wasn't me.

[CountValentine]

Significantly less so than changing the rules in the middle of the election to benefit one side does.

So making it easier for people to vote during a pandemic favors one side? Which side is that?

[AsherO]

So making it easier for people to vote during a pandemic favors one side? Which side is that?

The side that exploits “easier” best

[zh cohen]

So making it easier for people to vote during a pandemic favors one side? Which side is that?

So making it easier for people to vote during a pandemic is a good enough reason to undermine faith in the democratic process?

[CountValentine]

So making it easier for people to vote during a pandemic is a good enough reason to undermine faith in the democratic process?

They didn't undermine anything by voting but go ahead and support THE BIG LIE.

[zh cohen]

THE BIG LIE.

Maybe if you make this bold and in red you will be less wrong (or you can try to make a logical argument rather than going to Nazi language).

[CountValentine]

Maybe if you make this bold and in red you will be less wrong (or you can try to make a logical argument rather than going to Nazi language).

Wrong about what? The election wasn't stolen. End of story. Move on!!!

[zh cohen]

Which side is that?

The one that used the pandemic to push through changes that they couldn't get through in the past.

[zh cohen]

The election wasn't stolen. End of story. Move on!!!

Only if you are using an extremely narrow definition of "stolen".

[yesitsme]

What did they do to trump?
Took away the ability to communicate they way any Joe can, including the PR. Of iran

What did the do to her?
The voted her out of position

How do compare the 2

Another point
The Republican party is biased, its a political party, sidelining someone because they don't fit their political position is standard
versus twitter thats supposedly unbiased
They have immunity under section 230 since they're not a publisher but a platform

[CountValentine]

...sidelining someone because they don't fit their political position is standard

Where is that pretzel? @aygart

[aygart]

They have immunity under section 230 since they're not a publisher but a platform

-1

[aygart]

Where is that pretzel? @aygart

THese? 

[CountValentine]

SNYDER'S

[aygart]

SNYDER'S

Who cares about the brand. What he wrote wasn't twisted at all.

[CountValentine]

Who cares about the brand. What he wrote wasn't twisted at all.

She was sideline because she wouldn't support Trumps lie. Unless the R's position is they support his lie then it is twisted.

[JlmBoi]

She was sideline because she wouldn't support Trumps lie. Unless the R's position is they support his lie then it is twisted.

I believe that's mainly pragmatic and due to their view on the future of the party. When twitter and facebook do something like this in the name of certain "values" something is very wrong. You have to be so twisted to find this in any way consistent with their general policies it's unbelievable.