I didn’t make anything about anything, I responded to a post claiming expanding voting “undermined faith”. It’s ironic because we all know exactly what “undermined faith” in elections recently. And the guy’s been doing it for years and has openly stated he wouldn’t accept the results of the election if it didn’t go his way (both in 2016 and 2020).
I admit I slightly misunderstood the emphasis in your post, but my point remains the same.
The post you responded to made a claim that the steps taken undermined faith in the voting process.
You stated that the
only reason faith was undermined was because of Trump. Now, separate conversation, we can discuss how much Trump overreacted, whether he was honest or not, whether he's to blame for everything from white supremacy to global warming and the rise of Hitler before WWII.
My point simply was that since everyone agrees that mail in ballots are notorious for voter fraud (long before Trump was president), Trump is not the
only reason expanding it made people lose faith in the integrity of the voting process.
A reasonable person looking at expanding a type of voting that is notorious for fraud, might well assume that there would be more fraud. Enough to change results? I don't know. But to say that no reasonable, unbiased person would be concerned about it if not for Trump, is not being honest.