Nobody wants change for the sake of change. People want change to fix all those problems. You know, like when people say "oh that's just how the world works" or "life isn't fair" or other such nonsense. We'll never have a perfect world, but if we keep trying it will keep getting better and more fair. Much as it's gotten better and better ever since the enlightenment. That is when people started realizing we can change things. Obviously, some of the solutions worked and others didn't but they all had the acknowledgment that a better world is possible as their initial premise.
You claim you aren't against change (I would prefer that you are against stagnation) but you're last comment implies you are. Reform judaism's flaw was the initial premise that a better judaism is possible, it isn't. When it relates to society, a better world is possible and therefore attainable if we try.
You misunderstood my comment.
You were saying "Change is good". To me that sounds like change for the sake of change is good.
Conservatives don't believe that change for the sake of change is good. Conservatives believe that change is good only when it is really good. Every "change" needs to be evaluated to see if it is really good.
Orthodox Jews always want to make Judaism better. But we don't want to change Judaism.
Conservatives are always trying to make our country better for everyone. But we don't want to change our country.
A good example: The racism that we saw by some police officers. Conservatives want to fix that, by firing and prosecuting the bad apples, and changing the culture in the police departments. But the left wants to defund the police - to destroy the entire fabric of our society. Sometimes, change isn't good. Fixing is better.
