Someone posted one side's perspective. @S209 posted the other side's perspective and made it very clear that it was coming from that side.
I think it is absolutely appropriate to balance the widespread dissemination of one side's perspective with the other side's perspective.
+1
Do you think posting pictures of his teenage siblings is beneficial? I think not, and I would venture to say that my Rav, and you, would agree.
Perhaps the harm outweighs the benefit, but why would it not be beneficial?
One is not referred to as an “agunah” simply by virtue of them wanting a Get and it not being given alone
I'm not sure if that's true. AFAIK the term Agunah simply means stranded ('Chained'), and it applies equally to women whose husbands are incapable of giving a Get or justly unwilling to.
I have no idea who your rav is, but anyone allowing protests based on a woman asking for a get; regardless of other factors is probably more worried about "social justice" than halacha.
I understand what you're trying to say, but Halacha is merely a tool to define the ultimate goal, which is indeed social justice. It's just often very different than prevailing perception of social justice.
They definitely would issue a divorce without requiring a Psak Beis Din first, which occurred here according to R’ Efram Goldberg in his interview. This has no bearing on the Halachic requirement of issuing a get, and stating otherwise is pure ignorance.
There is definitely a lot of weight given to the state and finality of their separation, I think a court ruling can have a lot of bearing on that.
Halacha. Moral compass. The law.
Show me where the law or Halacha allow doxxing and threatening messages to family members. Its abuse, plain and simple.
See upthread. It doesn't look like it would apply in this case, but in general Halacha explicitly allows hurting family members to pressure a husband to give a Get.