Total Members Voted: 100
You picked the side of you can't use deadly force to protect property. So why did he bring the AR15 if he was protecting property?
To protect himself while using non deadly force to protect property.
What non deadly force was he going use.
stupid argument
If he would've been 18 and accepted a position as an armed security guard that night, would he have been well within his rights be to there?
AP dead or Obi dead?
A fire extinguisher? We know he put out a fire(s) that night
I have no skin in this game, btw. I'm not emotionally involved either way. I'm just playing devils advocate, same as you are. I happen to think that I picked a way more defensible side.
according to this security guards shouldn't ever be hired to protect property
Are you being intentionally asinine?
Did it occur to you that people brought guns precisely because of the heated protest? If the police are deliberately not protecting you, nor preventing the heated protest, do you lose your rights to protect your property? Instead of rushing to remove rights, we should prevent heated protests and protect the victims, and ensure that we don’t have to fall back to our occasionally ugly, yet important 2nd amendment rights.
I don't know if that makes me a liberal but I definitely don't know nothing about guns. I've read on the case a bit and gathered it was a terrible killing machine, not your regular pistol.
Let me guess, you probably also think a silencer silences the gun.
Quotes in a signature is annoying, as it comes across as an independent post.
Lol are you testing my gun knowledge? As I said I know nothing about guns (BH).
Lol are you testing my gun knowledge? As I said I know nothing about guns (BH). I've voted Trump second term but I haven't become a redneck, Kyle is not my hero and Faucci is not my devil. I didn't buy the whole package.
Rare commodity these days
Ok that's fine, but before you start saying machine guns or a killing machine as opposed to pistols, please become familiar with guns and gun laws.
Poll