Definitely curious to see more on this case. On a moral level, I think there is plenty of leeway for her, but on a legal level it's a lot more complicated. I believe there is a different legal stance when someone believes they are in danger and reacts in that moment, vs when they are in general danger and reacts when an opportunity is given at a later time. Can't say I wouldn't do the same in her case (leaving aside the arson and theft for a moment) but not sure if the law upholds it. Really sad situation that seems to be more prevalent than we'd like to admit.