Author Topic: Frum anti-vax campaigns funding source  (Read 7133 times)

Offline aygart

  • Dansdeals Lifetime 10K Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *******
  • Join Date: May 2008
  • Posts: 18344
  • Total likes: 14543
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 14
    • View Profile
    • Lower Watt Energy Brokers
  • Programs: www.lowerwatt.com
Re: Frum anti-vax campaigns funding source
« Reply #80 on: December 30, 2021, 03:03:24 PM »


Taking Dr. Zlencos's cocktail (without any study)

Including his own
Feelings don't care about your facts

Offline Alexsei

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 5829
  • Total likes: 1444
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 5
    • View Profile
    • Travel & Kivrei Zadikim
  • Location: Truckistan
  • Programs: COVID-23
Re: Frum anti-vax campaigns funding source
« Reply #81 on: December 30, 2021, 03:16:43 PM »
[tweet]1476647772690518016[/tweet]
Jews ≠ Zionists
Palestinians ≠ Hamas
Satmar ≠ SatmarHQ

Offline Alexsei

  • Dansdeals Lifetime Presidential Platinum Elite
  • *********
  • Join Date: Sep 2011
  • Posts: 5829
  • Total likes: 1444
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 5
    • View Profile
    • Travel & Kivrei Zadikim
  • Location: Truckistan
  • Programs: COVID-23
Re: Frum anti-vax campaigns funding source
« Reply #82 on: December 30, 2021, 04:17:45 PM »
@skyguy918 I don't think it is the same data, yours showed per 100k pop and i'm not sure if it is accounting for each of the cohorts, in any case check the sources of the tweet, additionally they are single day data not commutative in any way
Jews ≠ Zionists
Palestinians ≠ Hamas
Satmar ≠ SatmarHQ

Online skyguy918

  • Dansdeals Presidential Platinum Elite
  • ********
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 4074
  • Total likes: 835
  • DansDeals.com Hat Tips 1
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Location: Queens, NY
Re: Frum anti-vax campaigns funding source
« Reply #83 on: December 30, 2021, 04:56:32 PM »
@skyguy918 I don't think it is the same data, yours showed per 100k pop and i'm not sure if it is accounting for each of the cohorts, in any case check the sources of the tweet, additionally they are single day data not commutative in any way
Bottom line is that he's insinuating (unless I'm missing something) that the vaccinated have a higher case rate (ie num of cases among vaccinated relative to the total vaccinated population) currently than the unvaccinated (same setup, cases among unvaccinated relative to total unvaccinated population). But PHAC claims that's not the case. Granted that his data is for literally 1 specific day (12/28 or 29), while theirs is showing the weekly average as of 12/4. If in fact the last few weeks of data show that transformation, all it really does is confirm what we already know - vaccination is less effective in preventing transmission of Omicron, but still effective at preventing hospitalization (as can be seen in that guy's other tweets - the parts of the screenshots he doesn't call attention to).
« Last Edit: December 30, 2021, 05:24:32 PM by skyguy918 »