1/6 Fedsurrection?

[whYME]

Maybe he has something from an FBI report. That isn't some nutcase.

Great idea, maybe someone should ask the FBI how may people they had on the ground then?
Hint: they did. The FBI won't say. (I wonder why)

BTW I need to say I'm not sure I agree with the second half of your statement

[AsherO]

Correct, although B was meant to be only mildly conspiratorial although I should've worded it better. (maybe "many" or "some" instead of "most"?)
What you said is actually very close to what I had in mind for B.

The options as you presented them leave very little space for people in the middle (a dying breed)

[CountValentine]

Great idea, maybe someone should ask the FBI how may people they had on the ground then?
Hint: they did. The FBI won't say. (I wonder why)

BTW I need to say I'm not sure I agree with the second half of your statement

So when the FBI doesn't comment on an ongoing investigation that means they are hiding something?

Of course, you are not sure. When they support your position, they are great. When they don't, they are nutcases.

[CountValentine]

The options as you presented them leave very little space for people in the middle (a dying breed)

Nope, we just didn't vote. 

[whYME]

You have lost your mind. Know you expect me to listen to 1 1/2 hours?

Put it on 1.75x ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[whYME]

The options as you presented them leave very little space for people in the middle (a dying breed)

What would be a good option for that?

[CountValentine]

Put it on 1.75x ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

This is the fired nutcase Trump speech writer. Was he fired for being involved with racist?
Now I know why you don't want to release your sources you are using. 

[whYME]

This is the fired nutcase Trump speech writer. Was he fired for being involved with racist?

Pretty much all I know about him is what was said in this video.

Now I know why you don't want to release your sources you are using. 

I wasn't hiding anything. It took a while because I was having 3 conversations at once and I tried to set some goalposts first.

Although yes, of course I knew this is what you would say but naturally forgot to lead with focus on the message not the messenger...

[whYME]

Eric Trump at the rally. Next question? 
“He has more fight in him than every other one combined, and they need to stand up and we need to march on the Capitol today. And we need to stand up for this country and stand up for what’s right,” he said.

I asked how they ended up in, not at the Capitol.

[whYME]

Of course, you are not sure. When they support your position, they are great. When they don't, they are nutcases.

FWIW I forgot the emoji. That looks waaay more serious than how it was intended

[zh cohen]

If they were Feds, how weren't they stopped before they actually breached the Capital?

That's exactly my question.

The answer is probably incompetence, but in light of the Whitmer "kidnapping" plot, I think there is a good chance that they wanted a bigger bust.

ETA: See the closing question from this article -https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-secret-commandos-shoot-kill-authority-were-capitol-1661330

If they were aware of a "sting operation" that might explain their precautions.

[whYME]

Apparently I'm not the only one having trouble coming up with good poll options

https://www.dailywire.com/news/cbs-buries-poll-results-showing-most-americans-of-both-parties-think-jan-6-was-a-protest-that-went-too-far

[whYME]

If they were Feds, how weren't they stopped before they actually breached the Capital?

I know, it almost looks like "the powers that be" wanted there to be a breach of the Capitol...

[whYME]

Ok, now for the fun stuff

I like this description I've seen of this article: "There is a little bit of hyperbole and opinion infused in the article, but if this does not convince you that January 6 was an orchestrated event, nothing will."
Personally I think there's a little more than just "a little hyperbole and opinion," as well as a fair bit of conjecture as well. But even after you strip that all away, just the facts seem pretty damning.
I'm not claiming this is definitive evidence of a deep state red flag, But I believe between everything I posted there's enough to pull it past the "crazy conspiracy theory without a shred of evidence" to something that a reasonable person can consider plausible.

https://www.revolver.news/2021/12/damning-new-details-massive-web-unindicted-operators-january-6/

[CountValentine]

You did a good job of laying out your conspiracy theory. Now all you need is evidence. Without evidence it is just another conspiracy theory.

Am I correct the smoking gun would be Ray Epps?

[CountValentine]

I asked how they ended up in, not at the Capitol.

So you understand why they went to the Capitol, correct? They were sent there by the people giving the speeches that day including Trumps son.

[whYME]

You did a good job of laying out your conspiracy theory. Now all you need is evidence. Without evidence it is just another conspiracy theory.

I'm not claiming definitively that there was any big conspiracy here, or that there's any smoking gun evidence.

I do believe I presented enough evidence that a reasonable person can find it plausible.

It may still be "just another conspiracy theory" but I wouldn't say it's completely crazy to believe or without a shred of evidence.

Am I correct the smoking gun would be Ray Epps?

I would say him and others would be the smoking gun of a suspicious fact pattern.

I believe a plausible and reasonable explanation of this fact pattern is that many of these people were feds/informants. (There may have been actual evidence of this with some of the Oath Keepers or Proud Boys, I don't remember offhand)
Where it goes from there, who knows. But as Barnes said, who had motive and profited from this?

[CountValentine]

I do believe I presented enough evidence that a reasonable person can find it plausible.

No it is not plausible no matter how many times you say it. You need evidence for it to be plausible. What you mean is it is possible. Just like it is possible you will win the lottery today but not plausible.

I believe a plausible and reasonable explanation of this fact pattern is that many of these people were feds/informants.

No that is a conspiracy theory without evidence. You have yet to provide one shread of evidence they were feds/informants.

What is your view on the JFK assassination? 

[whYME]

So you understand why they went to the Capitol, correct? They were sent there by the people giving the speeches that day including Trumps son.

I don't think anyone is denying this. Didn't Trump himself also say it?

The question is what were they "sent" to do?

[CountValentine]

I don't think anyone is denying this. Didn't Trump himself also say it?

The question is what were they "sent" to do?

STOP THE STEAL!!!

Now Mr Plausible. 
Is it plausible for them to take that as meaning to go inside and stop the vote?