https://nationalpost.com/news/lawsuit-twitter-free-speechNot sure I understand. Twitter is being sued because users are contractually able to purchase ads and plaintiff was refused, thereby restricting their free speech? It doesn't speak to Twitter or people's right to free speech, it's a technical contract issue?
AP dead or Obi dead?
As a Canadian who sees CBC's journalism, I appreciate this tweet. https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1648135878454177794
Twitter is complying with more government demands under Elon MuskThe company has not refused a single request since Musk took ownership, according to self-reported data.Since Musk took ownership, the company has received 971 government demands, and fully complied with 808 of them.Before Musk, Twitter's full compliance rate hovered around 50%; since the takeover, it is over 80%.... As part of the drastic reduction in Twitter’s employee count, Musk has decimated many of the departments that process government requests, which may have reduced the company’s ability to resist such orders. At the same time, Musk has made clear in interviews that his vision of free speech does not extend to legal requests.“We can’t go beyond the laws of a country,” he said in a recent interview with the BBC. “If we have a choice of either our people go to prison or we comply with the laws, we’ll comply with the laws.”
