FBI Raids Mar A Lago

[zh cohen]

You like how he is the one that mentions nuclear? 

Affidavit heavily redacted!!! Nothing mentioned on “Nuclear,” a total public relations subterfuge by the FBI & DOJ, or our close working relationship regarding document turnover – WE GAVE THEM MUCH. Judge Bruce Reinhart should NEVER have allowed the Break-In of my home. He recused himself two months ago from one of my cases based on his animosity and hatred of your favorite President, me. What changed? Why hasn’t he recused himself on this case? Obama must be very proud of him right now!

Did you miss this? Or are you suggesting that @Baruch is actually Trump?

So it was nuclear weapons.

[CountValentine]

Did you miss this? Or are you suggesting that @Baruch is actually Trump?

You have Trump and FBI/DOJ. The rest is noise. It is Trump with all the noise and DOJ/FBI with facts.

[CountValentine]

Trumps crackerjack lawyers are a day late and dollar short. 
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/justice-dept-has-reviewed-documents-seized-in-mar-a-lago-search/ar-AA11eimb?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=bdb4bcf34753c808374a07584456b868

[CountValentine]

Major shift in the right-wing talking points. From they have nothing on him too should they charged him? Spinless LG throws the riots threat out there.

[CountValentine]

Coming to a prison near you! 

[yungermanchik]

Coming to a prison near you! 

Still can't read it!

[Baruch]

Coming to a prison near you! 

What was he thinking? I can't understand his reluctance to return all the Top secret docs. There's something off here. We don't have all the info..........

I don't buy the Orange Baby theory. Did DOJ spell out to him he's committing crimes?

[AsherO]

Major shift in the right-wing talking points. From they have nothing on him too should they charged him? Spinless LG throws the riots threat out there.

Don’t worry, they’ll be “mostly peaceful protests”.

[CountValentine]

Don’t worry, they’ll be “mostly peaceful protests”.

Not according to LG.

[AsherO]

Not according to LG.

If you were objective I’d bet you that no matter what it wouldn’t get worse than BLM riots, but you aren’t that honest.

[CountValentine]

If you were objective I’d bet you that no matter what it wouldn’t get worse than BLM riots, but you aren’t that honest.

It is very possible it wouldn't be worse than BLM, Antifa, Rodney King or any other riots.
Any honest person would understand the difference. Just like Jan 6 these riots if they occur will be direct supporters of the ex-president. Those other riots were not direct supporters of any president, but some of the so-called honest people here try to pin them on the current admin or past D admin.

But go right ahead and question my honesty!

[AsherO]

It is very possible it wouldn't be worse than BLM, Antifa, Rodney King or any other riots.
Any honest person would understand the difference. Just like Jan 6 these riots if they occur will be direct supporters of the ex-president. Those other riots were not direct supporters of any president, but some of the so-called honest people here try to pin them on the current admin or past D admin.

But go right ahead and question my honesty!

Anyone who disagrees with you is dishonest. Got it.

[CountValentine]

Anyone who disagrees with you is dishonest. Got it.

Nice strawman response.

Now if the pattern of this forum continues many will "like" your posts just to prove how "honest" everyone here is.

[AsherO]

Nice strawman response.

Now if the pattern of this forum continues many will "like" your posts just to prove how "honest" everyone here is.

Yours is a classic No True Scotsman. I’m an honest person and I disagree with your assertion. The Ds are equally off the rails as the Trumpers and at least equally responsible for the situation the country is in, and that includes the subject of the this thread. That’s my opinion, call me dishonest all you want.

[CountValentine]

Yours is a classic No True Scotsman. I’m an honest person and I disagree with your assertion. The Ds are equally off the rails as the Trumpers and at least equally responsible for the situation the country is in, and that includes the subject of the this thread. That’s my opinion, call me dishonest all you want.

I never called you are dishonest. You went down that rabbit hole all by yourself.

If you don't understand the difference between rioting in the name of a candidate and rioting for your own benefit, then I can try and help you understand.

[zh cohen]

Those other riots were not direct supporters of any president.

Even worse, the current VP supported the rioters.

[CountValentine]

Even worse, the current VP supported the rioters.

That is your opinion, but the fact remains they are not rioting in the name of any candidate.

[aygart]

rioting for your own benefit, .

Those were great sneakers and televisions.

[zh cohen]

That is your opinion

What is my opinion? That Kamala Harris supported those who were arrested (i.e. rioters) during the protests?

[CountValentine]

What is my opinion? That Kamala Harris supported those who were arrested (i.e. rioters) during the protests?

If you have something that shows she supported the riots then post it.
If your gotcha is she supported bailing individuals out, you are barking up the wrong tree.
The fact still remains the riots were not in the name of any president or candidate.