There have been numerous articles and letters that have pointed to egregious errors, the Times going against its own policy of when sources are granted anonymity, and a slew of examples of biased and dishonest framing. Yet not a single correction has been issued on a single one of their many stories in the series. They haven't even responded to any critiques to defend or explain their reporting.
How does that compare with their response to errors found in other stories?
How often do they respond to critiques of their reporting?
Note, I didn't use the word antisemitism...
I was focused on the Agudah's "year in review".
https://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?topic=130619.msg2746907#msg2746907We had a year in which one yeshiva admitted to fraud and was required to pay 8 million dollars.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/10/24/nyregion/hasidic-yeshiva-fraud-central-united-talmudical-academy.htmlWe had a year in which 18 yeshivas were found to provide inadequate education in English and math.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/06/30/nyregion/nyc-hasidic-yeshivas-education.htmlWe had a year in which the Agudah and others sued NYSED's ruling with 9 points, 8-and-a-half of which were struck out by the judge because they were, in effect, either untrue, exaggerated, showed lack of careful reading of a text, or lack of logical thinking.
And so one would expect the Agudah's "year in review" would focus on how we can improve our yeshivas, ensure that all our yeshiva employees behave ethically, create appropriate teaching materials, encourage critical thinking...
Nope! They've learned only that the NYT is antisemitic, and we should raise funds to fight the media.