Trump States a big announcement coming NOV 15 will he run?

[yelped]

More or less accurate than a DDF poll? 

I find (according to the polls on the bottom of these articles) that those reading MSN are usually older and white, slightly left leaning but mostly center.

[CountValentine]

If Trump doesn't get the R nomination, does he run under a third party, TTL?

[EliJelly]

If Trump doesn't get the R nomination, does he run under a third party, TTL?

Makes perfectly sense for him, he wouldn't allow the Republicans to have any successes without him being in center.

[CountValentine]

A worrisome poll number for Donald Trump
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/a-worrisome-poll-number-for-donald-trump/ar-AA14r7TU?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=c4ffd8482a684d44f3a5795c6a566190


It’s his numbers among independents (58% said him running is a bad thing) and even among Republicans (27% said it is a bad thing) that should be of concern to the former president.

[JMHO]

Why are you so obsessed with this man?

.

[CountValentine]

WATCH: Focus Group of Trump Voters Trashes ‘Narcissist’ Former President While Unanimously Praising ‘Badass’ Ron DeSantis
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/watch-focus-group-of-trump-voters-trashes-narcissist-former-president-while-unanimously-praising-badass-ron-desantis/ar-AA14qcyu?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=e316e1067d0542c3b07f694e152d2adf

[JMHO]

Why are you so obsessed with this man?

@CountValentine

[YitzyS]

I have no doubt that if the election is today he would fall flat on his face and would not win a primary. The only question is what he does between now and then. He gave one speech with a serious tone and half the Republican pundits were praising him. If he keeps at it, he has a shot at the primaries. But at the general election however, that's a different story.

[CountValentine]

I have no doubt that if the election is today he would fall flat on his face and would not win a primary. The only question is what he does between now and then. He gave one speech with a serious tone and half the Republican pundits were praising him. If he keeps at it, he has a shot at the primaries. But at the general election however, that's a different story.

Half R pundits praised him. That is less than his 30-35% base. The other half trashed him along with the 100% of D pundits.

Why are you saying he would not win a primary? Are you assuming he will be challenged and if so, it will only be one challenger?

[aygart]

I have no doubt that if the election is today he would fall flat on his face and would not win a primary. The only question is what he does between now and then. He gave one speech with a serious tone and half the Republican pundits were praising him. If he keeps at it, he has a shot at the primaries. But at the general election however, that's a different story.

Don't underestimate the power of his leitzanus.

[CountValentine]

Here we go again. Just like David Duke. You would think he would hide his racism. I guess hosting an antisemite wasn't bad enough.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-tries-to-distance-himself-from-white-supremacist-nick-fuentes-after-hosting-him-for-dinner-at-mar-a-lago/ar-AA14yG62?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6a2de089e8294a94bfda2fa6d8f3b135

“Kanye West very much wanted to visit Mar-a-Lago. Our dinner meeting was intended to be Kanye and me only, but he arrived with a guest whom I had never met and knew nothing about,” Trump said.

[yelped]

Here we go again. Just like David Duke. You would think he would hide his racism. I guess hosting an antisemite wasn't bad enough.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-tries-to-distance-himself-from-white-supremacist-nick-fuentes-after-hosting-him-for-dinner-at-mar-a-lago/ar-AA14yG62?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=6a2de089e8294a94bfda2fa6d8f3b135

“Kanye West very much wanted to visit Mar-a-Lago. Our dinner meeting was intended to be Kanye and me only, but he arrived with a guest whom I had never met and knew nothing about,” Trump said.

https://twitter.com/DavidM_Friedman/status/1596259987718049792

[CountValentine]

So, Trump wants those that vote for an antisemite to vote for him. When are people (yes, I am looking at you) going to wake up?

[drosenberg88429]

So, Trump wants those that vote for an antisemite to vote for him. When are people (yes, I am looking at you) going to wake up?

Plenty of people are anti semitic (and racist, and homophobic, and xenophobic, and plenty of other bigoted dispositions). Good or bad, it's a fact of life. It doesn't mean they their potential voters all are too, or that one shouldn't want to woo them because of that. A politician can't write off every part of the electorate whose personal views don't all completely conform with what they consider moral or ethical.

West's anti semitism is pretty low down on the list of things making him an absurd choice for president, though, in my opinion. It shouldn't take a 5 minute conversation with any of his voters to be a powerful argument against democracy. Anyone a bit more stable than Trump would realize his "candidacy" is a joke (West may be a strange bird, but I think he's more sane than the Donald) and would play along instead of getting into a childish fight with him.

[CountValentine]

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/to-those-jews-who-still-support-him/ar-AA14CjDB?ocid=msedgntp&cvid=57f65be580f74ea18cdcc552ee7b5855

...but his policies. 

[CountValentine]

His new hashtag - #MAHA

[aygart]

CNN: Trump calls for the termination of the Constitution in Truth Social post.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/03/politics/trump-constitution-truth-social/index.html

[CountValentine]

Some were under the delusion he has changed with his announcement and will stick to the issues.

BUBBLE!!!

[zh cohen]

Some were under the delusion he has changed with his announcement and will stick to the issues.

Anyone who thought either of those things was delusional.

[drosenberg88429]

If a trial verdict was reached on the basis of evidence being suppressed, and it later comes to light, the verdict is overturned and a new trial is in order. Is Trump completely logically unfounded in his thought process that the election result is faulty, assuming his facts were accurate? If it is true that there was massive corruption involved in a cover-up that caused a different election result than would have happened otherwise, is it ridiculous to say that the election was based on false pretenses and a new election is in order? Assuming that there would have been evidence that there was massive Russian collusion and interference in the 2016 election, and that was what caused Trump to win, would the Democrats not have been calling for a new election?

The headlines may be more clickbaity than substantive.

Talking purely theoretically. (Incidentally, I personally happen to think Trump is a lunatic.)