I have no issue reading or calling out anti-sematic tropes when I see them.
"Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg, who was hand-picked and funded by George Soros, is a disgrace."
What is a disgrace is those here that don't call this out and instead deflect.
It. Is. Literally. True.
I don't know who you are quoting. I said before, some use this to spread antisemitism intentionally, and some aren't, but antisemites use their words as fodder. If it's the former, they'll have plenty of antisemitism to their name, you won't need to come to a "trope". And for the latter, I asked, how can they speak about it without being called antisemites?
That is odd as since I was a kid, I heard of Jews controlling money, media, Hollywood and many other Jewish tropes.
The people who told you those antisemitic things were called antisemites because they were antisemites. The idea of someone being called an antisemite because of "tropes" even though the thing they said isn't actually antisemitic seems to me to be a new thing that started in 2016.