Its Open Season on Minorities Master Thread!

[Lurker]

You just put your definition of the phrase, but I am not allowed to do the same. Got it.

Please stop trying to derail this thread.

https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/open+season+on

Feel free to provide an alternate definition.

And this thread wouldn't get derailed if you didn't insist on posting every idiot's idea of perceived bias (see singing competition).

[aygart]

You just put your definition of the phrase, but I am not allowed to do the same. Got it.

Please stop trying to derail this thread.

Ok. Just so that no one else, G-d forbid, makes the same mistake that I did, can you clearly state the purpose for which you created this thread?

?

[CountValentine]

And this thread wouldn't get derailed if you didn't insist on posting every idiot's idea of perceived bias (see singing competition).

Five thugs kill an innocent black man and all you want to talk about is some non-sense. I don't need to ask why.
Police going after a black man is a perceived bias? Ignorance leads to stupidity.

[CountValentine]

The following content has been identified by the YouTube community as inappropriate or offensive to some audiences.
Viewer discretion is advised

[S209]

You are wrong.
From day one members have to tried derail this thread and it continues. I don't need to ask why.
What's next? Another ignorant racist "all lives matter" comment.

You referring to this?

All Lives Matter

[CountValentine]

You referring to this?

I am referring to it any time it is said when a minority is killed. Either the poster doesn't understand the meaning for BLM or is a racist. Saying "all lives matter" in a thread where minorities are getting killed is sickening.

[S209]

I am referring to it any time it is said when a minority is killed. Either the poster doesn't understand the meaning for BLM or is a racist. Saying "all lives matter" in a thread where minorities are getting killed is sickening.

I was saying it tongue in cheek, referencing the fact that you were creating a general minority thread in response to a thread about a specific minority. I though that was obvious.

[CountValentine]

I was saying it tongue in cheek, referencing the fact that you were creating a general minority thread in response to a thread about a specific minority. I though that was obvious.

This why I started this thread:

There are just too many of these to keep opening a new thread each time.

I didn't take it as tongue in cheek when it was the first post after a mass killing but will take your word for it.

[aygart]

Five thugs kill an innocent black man and all you want to talk about is some non-sense. I don't need to ask why.
Police going after a black man is a perceived bias? Ignorance leads to stupidity.

Please explain to me why I should think that five black officers beating a black man should be assumed to be bias

[CountValentine]

Please explain to me why I should think that five black officers beating a black man should be assumed to be bias

Study after study shows bias especially toward young black men by the police. You feel this had nothing to do with race. I am not going to go 100 pages debating this. 

[aygart]

Study after study shows bias especially toward young black men by the police. You feel this had nothing to do with race. I am not going to go 100 pages debating this.

This is untrue as I have expressed many times in the past. I fully get the sentiment behind BLM. I am quote confident that there are many examples of bias against blacks by police. I am sceptical that this is one of them considering they were all black themselves.

[CountValentine]

This is untrue as I have expressed many times in the past.

What is untrue?

[S209]

This why I started this thread:I didn't take it as tongue in cheek when it was the first post after a mass killing but will take your word for it.

C’mon. You opened a thread mimicking the wording of the “Open season on Jews” thread and made two rapid posts. I appreciate you taking my word for it, if others didn’t realize as well, free to chime in with how you understood it.

(By the way, the post that started this thread. Was it shown to be a bigoted/racist attack? I don’t know the answer, just curious.)

[CountValentine]

C’mon. You opened a thread mimicking the wording of the “Open season on Jews” thread and made two rapid posts.

That thread used the appropriate words so no need to reinvent the wheel.
WOW, there is a distinct pattern here I am being accused of.

[aygart]

What is untrue?

Looking back I think I read too fast and thought when you wrote this

You feel this had nothing to do with race.

It was gong back on the first sentence but now I see it is more likely referring to this specific case.

I fully get that there is bias but have a hard time assuming 5 black officers are biased against blacks.

[CountValentine]

Let's recap. Since my OP on the latest killing there have been about 18 posts (not counting mine). One comment in passing calling it a "horrible thing". Good thing no one is trying to derail this thread. 

[EliJelly]

Black man in Louisiana was killed by lighting during severe weather.

(I hope this is the appropriate thread. The man was clearly from a minority group)

[CountValentine]

Black man in Louisiana was killed by lighting during severe weather.

(I hope this is the appropriate thread. The man was clearly from a minority group)

Everyone of your non-sense posts from this point on I will now quote and post in this thread: https://forums.dansdeals.com/index.php?topic=112185.0

[aygart]

Definitely simpler than explaining why we should think it is from bias.

[EliJelly]

Sorry but I don't see any other way to explain to you that black on black or Jew on Jew isn't a racist attack. I admire the patience of the other members here who unsuccessfully tried to beat in that logic into you in the past 36754 pages.