Antisemitism And Antisemites

[aygart]

So much for equal opportunity employment:
https://x.com/Joe_Roberts01/status/1744182143905939947

Do people really think it wasn't always this way?

[Just A Jew]

So much for equal opportunity employment:

The survey was done in Nov 2022. I've seen these numbers before, possibly even somewhere on DDF. Can't imagine what the updated numbers look like.

[Kobe Bryant]

John Cusack

[Kobe Bryant]

NYU professor Amin Husain

[Kobe Bryant]

Macklemore

[jj1000]

Macklemore

This guy, dressed like this at a concert? An anti-semite? No way 😂

[Just A Jew]

This guy, dressed like this at a concert? An anti-semite? No way 😂

For a song about being cheap. Dude's been on the list for a decade already.

[Dan]

Macklemore

(Language)
https://twitter.com/matisyahu/status/1790101927876837443

[Euclid]

(Language)
https://twitter.com/matisyahu/status/1790101927876837443

Does this video have a picture of Brad Pitt from Inglorious Basterds where he plays a nazi hunter to show how the haircut is a Nazi haircut?

[Just A Jew]

Does this video have a picture of Brad Pitt from Inglorious Basterds where he plays a nazi hunter to show how the haircut is a Nazi haircut?

Lol!!

[Kobe Bryant]

https://www.memri.org/reports/miami-imam-dr-fadi-kablawi-we-are-not-here-kill-anyone-if-we-can-take-your-country-and

[aygart]

https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/1/59


https://x.com/ProfDBernstein/status/1794731424815141228

[EliJelly]

https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/1/59


https://x.com/ProfDBernstein/status/1794731424815141228

This sounds very interesting. Can you post the full text of this tweet like TimT usually does?

[aygart]

This sounds very interesting. Can you post the full text of this tweet like TimT usually does?

Post

See new posts
Conversation
David Bernstein
@ProfDBernstein
Who are the most and least antisemitic Americans by ideology? I happened across this very interesting and provocative paper by Fordham political scientist Jeffrey Cohen. He points out some important flaws in past research, and concludes: The least antisemitic Americans are mainstream liberals and conservatives. The most antisemitic are the extreme left, the extreme right, and low information voters, who skew surveys by often self-identifying as "moderate." Cohen's underlying thesis is also interesting. The mainstream elite in the US has been philo-semitic since the 1950s. People who have mainstream political views and take their cues from mainstream sources follow that mainstream consensus. But those who take their cues and get their news elsewhere are, obviously, less influenced by this consensus and thus much more likely to hold antisemitic views. Cohen doesn't get into this, but the upshot isn't a happy one for American Jews. Increasing numbers of Americans don't trust the "establishment" and take their cues and get their news from extremists or demagogues just looking for clicks. Consider how many young people rely on TikTok, of all things, for information. This helps explain the rise in antisemitism in recent years. It also helps explains why so many Jews are intuitively uncomfortable with Trump and his blowing up of the Republican mainstream, and more recently with Biden's failure to articulate and implement a defense of the Democratic mainstream from the far left

[TimT]

The French
https://x.com/Osint613/status/1802793864576553183

[Dan]

[ExGingi]

Thanks for posting.

IMHO Natasha made the best arguments followed by Douglas. For anyone familiar with facts and history, IMHO Gideon came out the worst, relying heavily on lies and distortions. Mehdi seemed to play honest, but his arguments came across very lop sided and relying on flawed sources.

Most importantly, if the definitions FOR THE SAKE OF THIS DEBATE were given in advance of any side presenting their argument, the fact that the con side strongest argument was to challenge the definitions used as the premise for the debate, becomes one of the strongest arguments against their side.

[Yehuda57]

Thanks for posting.

IMHO Natasha made the best arguments followed by Douglas. For anyone familiar with facts and history, IMHO Gideon came out the worst, relying heavily on lies and distortions. Mehdi seemed to play honest, but his arguments came across very lop sided and relying on flawed sources.

Most importantly, if the definitions FOR THE SAKE OF THIS DEBATE were given in advance of any side presenting their argument, the fact that the con side strongest argument was to challenge the definitions used as the premise for the debate, becomes one of the strongest arguments against their side.

Neither side truly argued the premise of the debate beyond opening statements (a bit), but rather devolved into a generic Israel/Palestine arguments. I was hopeful Douglass would use Mehdi to reveal the façade of anti Zionism as pure Jew hatred (I wasn't familiar with the other two panelists going in), but sadly he didn't. I understand why he didn't, he is excellent in such debates, as he takes the opponents words and tone and responds in kind (he gets personal when they do, argues facts when they do, etc.) That's why he wins debates and I wouldn't.

[Dan]

https://x.com/EFischberger/status/1803130880765903315

[ExGingi]

https://x.com/EFischberger/status/1803130880765903315

Many think this is a key moment.

https://x.com/EricAbbenante/status/1803157048177160408