Current question: Does gender affirming care breach the doctrine of do no harm?
Current results: 8-0 yes
Supporting evidence ZERO!!!
You know how little kids cover their eyes and think that means you can't see them? I'm getting that type of vibe here...
The question was not "does any major organization say that gender affirming care breach the doctrine of do no harm?"
The question was if it does.
I think that the evidence I provided to show that these permanent alterations to a person's body are being done based on little to no evidence is very good supporting evidence for the claim that it violates the doctrine of 'do no harm.'
If you disagree, please explain why.