Purim costume no no's

[HudZ]

I don't recall exactly. it's been a few years. It's based on how temporary something really has to be to be called temporary. although, IIRC he also had issue with writing on your hand with a pen so there must be more to it.

Interesting...  But as he says...

Emphasis in this phrase should always be on AYLOR

[Moshe Green]

This is such a thread where @CV would shine.
We need a left-wing democratic liberal for direction here.
Quote from: imayid2 on August 03, 2022, 10:44:29 AM
You’re not a democrat?
Quote from: CountValentine on August 03, 2022, 10:46:04 AM
Not the last time I checked.

Democratic not democrat

[ushdadude]

Emphasis in this phrase should always be on AYLOR

It should really be AYLOP (posek)
Many shailas are beyond what a shul Rabbi can answer but not all of them know that.

[HudZ]

It should really be AYLOP (posek)
Many shailas are beyond what a shul Rabbi can answer but not all of them know that.

   100%, that should be common sense. To only ask someone who is competent to answer.
And the Rav as well should know when to say that he should ask someone else if he isn't sure... I Once asked my Rav (a Baki in many different Inyanim) a Shaila in Choshen Mishpat, he thought abt what I asked, and told me that he prefers I ask someone who is a baki in Choshen Mishpat...

[AsherO]

It should really be AYLOP (posek)

Do we really need to waste a Posek-grade Rabbi’s time asking about temporary tattoos? If we all did they’d get 100s such questions a year.

[ushdadude]

Do we really need to waste a Posek-grade Rabbi’s time asking about temporary tattoos? If we all did they’d get 100s such questions a year.

I wasn't referring to this specifically...but there are different levels of poskim. If a shul Rav never learned through the sugya of ksovas kaka, I probably wouldn't ask him.

Maybe we can designate worthy men to help out the lead poskim.

[Randomex]

(Things that date to the 1800s shouldn't be referred to with "throughout history.")

[whacked1]

(Things that date to the 1800s shouldn't be referred to with "throughout history.")

Why not? Are you opposed the letter?

[aygart]

Why not? Are you opposed the letter?

Sounds more like he feels that they didn't word it properly and he's right about that

[whacked1]

Sounds more like he feels that they didn't word it properly and he's right about that

perhaps they should've added "american". Throughout american history.

[aygart]

perhaps they should've added "american". Throughout american history.

They should have just said historically