See, you claim they do it for political aspirations. That is a loaded question.
Most of them do it because they believe in the causes. You need to look at the options if speaking out will help your causes overall or hurt them.
I can agree with that statement inasmuch with regard to those who pick and choose when to speak up.
As i mentioned earlier, the ADL's left leaning track record is what put JG in a position to call out MSNBC while on their own show.
He acquired social/political capital and used it to champion his stated cause. Kudos to him
But once you get into the people who use the capital and brand name they acquired while championing the cause, to whitewash violations of said cause when the perpetrators don't meet their political bias or narrative, that excuse doesn't hold anymore.
Having said that, I return to my original statement.
I understand the need for politics in these orgs.
But any real humanitarian org needs to be cause first politics second, because once it is politics first the cause goes out the window.
Has the red cross demanded access to hostages yet to ensure their safety?
I know they did when israel held terrorists in their prisons. With conditions likely better then they would have in gaza
UPDATE: It seems like they released some statements today
