That's almost always the case, so you can never opine on anything?
You may opine on whatever you wish, whenever you wish. In a case where there are highly confidential tactical and strategical security considerations, in a multi-front war, opining on a strategic move while KNOWING that many pieces of the puzzle are unknown to me, is futile.
You claim Netanyahu has been so amazing this time round, I don't think the facts over the past year+ bear that out at all. It was Netanyahu who allowed almost 100,000 of his citizens to remain homeless for more than a year knowing full well that he had the capability of doing to Hezbollah since the beeper attack since October 8th.
So are you trying to say that Netanyahu should have ordered the beeper attack on Nov. 9, 2023? Or are you saying it should have been done at a different date?
Are you aware that Netanyahu is fighting an eight-(or more)-front war? (Gaza, Lebanon, Judea & Samaria, Yemen, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Israeli fifth column, and a hostile US (deep) State Department).
Resources are limited and need to be deployed in the most efficient way. I wouldn't want to be in his shoes!
Keeping so many Israelis out of their homes for so long is terrible. Unfortunately when one is in the midst of an existential war, there might not be any good choices.
It was Netanyahu who delayed the war for 6 months when the entire world knows that time is the biggest enemy of an army reliant on reservists. This ties into the first point as well.
Again, do you have all the data that was considered in making the decisions? Where the Gaza operation was up to? What troops and munitions are available? What intelligence information is available? What behind the scenes negotiations are going on with the major ally, and what political considerations are relevant to those? Having to deal with a powerful, deeply embedded fifth column (did anyone say Gallant?) that tries to influence US and world opinions and actions against the best interests of Israel.
I've detailed other blunders numerous times upthread, and that doesn't even take into account that October 7th happened on his watch and was the result of his decades long Gaza policy.
I'm not sure which blunders you are referring to, but I beg you to show anyone who did or would do a better job under the circumstances.
Bibi's biggest problem is that he tries to respect and conform to laws and established institutions. Not everyone can pull off a disregard of those and keep on going like Putin, Xi, Haminei, or Kim.
Unfortunately he inherited terrible situations and agreements (he was opposed to the Gaza "disengagement" and resigned from the government because of it), and he feels bound by them. He believes in democracy and democratic institutions, even if those have been hijacked by Bolsheviks, as per the Soviet strategy described by Yuri Bezmenov.
Bibi is as narcissistic as it comes. His political survival remains his sole objective. You rail against the kochi votzem yadi attitude a lot, but seem to have massive blindspots with Bibi, it's guess it's because you hate his opponents more.
Ranking Bibi's level of narcissism is subjective.
If you think that "his political survival remains his sole objective" that is an indication that the Bolshevik propaganda managed to brainwash you too.
I am fully aware, and am extremely critical of Bibi's כוחי ועוצם ידי attitude, and have derided people for reading or promoting his book (I started reading it and dropped it in disgust when I saw that Zionist attitude in the first few pages).
All of that notwithstanding, I see him as the most competent, capable, and honest person on the scene.
I have no respect for any of his "opponents" who constantly display their envy, hatred and incompetence. If the opposition would put someone like Einat Wilff to run against him, then it would be a case of a left-wing Zionist vs a right-wing Zionist, but in the past two decades those that ran against him were not ideologically motivated, it has been non-stop envy and hatred.
And finally, I don't see him (or Trump) as some kind of Messiah, much less as infallible, but on balance, the combination of Bibi and Trump seems like a good hand to be dealt.